eyes. what are you going to do next? there have been twoth other courts that have ruled opposite and we appealed this to the ninth circuit and we will appeal it again. we just heartily disagree, it s a bad precedent and it will be expensive, and it s contrary to the health of professionals that we ve had reviewing inmate edmo s record and all the things about the inmate. it s just contrary to good practices, and it s another example of activist courts getting in the middle of something and creating a precedent that s going to be expensive for the taxpayers of idaho and potentially all the taxpayers of the united states. laura: it s a complete scam. it is the inmate was the inmate born a woman? i confess, i can t tell from this. born a woman or born a man? born a man.
injunction paired they are growing tired of single federal district judges in seattle or san francisco or someplace counter managing the president of the united states on dealing with national security. laura: don t you think the white house has to get on this, working with republicans in congress to put an end to the nationwide injunctions? they can circumscribe the jurisdiction of the lower courts. they can come i think this up report is about to do it, as well. laura: judge gort believed in that, god rest his soul, and he understood the damage being done by activist court. if trump has had to deal with this at every turn. is not just activist courts. we are dealing with a level of activism we haven t seen before, a large number of the judiciary seem to have joined a resistance movement against the result of the 2016 election paired laura: entertainment industries, and judges with their costumes. border security is vitally important, so come too, is something that doesn t g
stuck together on this saying talk about thomas s fiery dissent, supreme court conservative revolution will wait another day. thomas is used to losing and it doesn t bother him but brett kavanaugh may think differently. this means roberts may exercise a moderating effect on the conservative wing of the court by having brett kavanaugh and a potential ally. my hope would be the court could follow the law. so many people in the right-wing are worried the court is an activist court and reset roe versus wade and undercut or overturn it. i would like to see them follow the law, that is a simple request. i was glad to see that they did on this decision. just hope they will continue to in the future. donald trump could help us out here if they could defund planned parenthood, not a single penny of our tax dollars going to fund abortion in the first
that s been opposed, as you heard chuck schumer from the very beginning. this is the swing seat. we are going to do everything we can to block this. this was a last-minute attempt to wen ice the me toot movement to block judge kavanaugh, but they used it because the stakes were so high. i think you would find the vast vast majority of those people who opposed judge kavanaugh from the begins and saw an opportunity to stop him. this is the power the supreme court has assumed to itself over the last 40 or 50 years, the left has used that to their advantage to get landmark cases to move their agenda forward that they couldn t get through the congress or the regular process, and now they see that day coming to an end. that is a big deal for them. so are conservatives who said the court has been too activist will say, wait a minute, we want an activist court?
don t put a liar on the court! don t put a liar on the court! don t put a liar on the court! don t put a liar on the court! don t put a liar on the court! laura: ah, nice. this is how they work their charms on democrat joe manchin after he announced he was supporting kavanaugh. shame, shame, shame, shame, shame, shame! laura: at least it s a one-word chant, easy to follow. you know what is shameful? democrats who use victimhood as their defining principle. they d rather have people dependent on government, helpless without it, especially certain groups, minorities, immigrants, and even women. we re supposed to believe that we can t survive and thrive without an activist court making up new rights, finding them in the constitution. and they demand that we believe anyone who claims victim status. we have to take them at their