activis activists. so they might resist this idea. does that make sense? i m trying to follow this logic. i totally understood that. if you say it s about big government but you have activists demanding more government, it actually hurts their cause. activists demanding more government. it s getting way too confusing for me. i think you and rand are right, get rid of the overburdensome law, put cops in a situation where they have to take down garner resisted arrest. he never should have died for that. you don t die for selling a loosy cigarette. but the root cause here is the law. the cops are forced to stop eric garner for selling a loose cigarette so they can protect their tax revenues. that s what it s all about. do you really believe that? that s not an argument do you really believe that? rand paul is deflecting this off on taxes.
activis activists. so they might resist this idea. does that make sense? i m trying to follow this logic. i totally understood that. if you say it s about big government but you have activists demanding more government, it actually hurts their cause. activists demanding more government. it s getting way too confusing for me. i think you and rand are right, get rid of the overburdensome law, put cops in a situation where they have to take down garner resisted arrest. he never should have died for that. you don t die for selling a loosy cigarette. but the root cause here is the law. the cops are forced to stop eric garner for selling a loose cigarette so they can protect their tax revenues. that s what it s all about. do you really believe that? that s not an argument do you really believe that? rand paul is deflecting this off on taxes.