between israel and hamas. the real risk is that we, the united states, will do the same thing we did with mubarak. we will allow centralization of control, abusive human rights in egypt, if the egyptians play buhl interests that we have, including the peace process. that s the dial we made with mubar ai think we near danger of acquiescing to that with morsi do too. eric. you mention the president obama, the new york times saying he was impressed with the leader s pragmatic confidence and sensed an engineer s precision with surprisingly little ideology and called him a straight shooter. is that a correct assessment or a misjudgment? we can t confuse morsi s long-term objectives, a consolidation of control and making the muslim brotherhood the key political force in the country with his tactics. on the way to do that
that statement out there. sure, but i mean if america is going to stand for something in these parts of the world you would think that we would stand for freedom of speech, and be a beacon to those people who live in that sort of terror, and sort of display to them that the way you face this sort of terror is through freedom not through, you know, fear and not through sort of acquiescing to people who would who are the opposite of believing in free speech. they believe in committing violence, they believe in driving loaded planes into tall buildings in order to condemn somebody that they don t even know for some beliefs that they haven t even heard directly, they just kind of heard that somebody over here thinks this. and it shows a tremendous weakness on the part of the united states, and i think that that honestly comes from the top down, you know, president obama when he went to cairo i guess it was three years ago in his first
environmentalism uses fear to control people. they started back with rachel carson with the silent spring. you had the dude with the population bomb. i think paul ehrlich that predicted the dire circumstances. why are they predicting dire circumstances to scare to us acquiescing to more government control. that s the whole point. they benefited by the media. i call it hip welfare. because environmentis environmee hip. people are less likely to check the facts. they could say anything as long as it doesn t get in way of a good story to get a free pass. kimberly: sure. they need fear tactics, et cetera, to authorize funding for problems like solyndra and waste taxpayers money on things that are not feasible. as we discussed before and solar and everything operating as ultimate highest potential, which it s not. we don t need to account for 16%. greg: we could harness the steam from bob s head. kimberly: he s doing a
president obama was heard saying this. this is my last election. after my election i have more flexibility. i understand you. i transmit this information to vladimir and i stand with you. he was asking for space when it comes to the hotly disputed missile defense system which would place a shield in countries neighboring russia. russia strongly opposes this system. so is the president saying i can t be seen catering to russian demands during an election year so wait until i m re-elected and i ll have more flexibility then? he may have decided it s not a good idea but if that s true it would still be a change. here the president is on the missile defense system in september, 2009. it deploys capabilities that are proven and cost effective and it sustains and builds upon our commitment to protect the u.s. homeland against long-range ballistic missile threats and ensures and enhances the protection of all our nato ally allies allies. now, even if the president s views on
tonight, caught red-handed on an open mic. wrapping up a meeting with russian president dmitry medvedev in seoul today, president obama was heard saying this. this is my last election. after my election i have more flexibility. i understand you. i transmit this information to vladimir and i stand with you. he was asking for space when it comes to the hotly disputed missile defense system which would place a shield in countries neighboring russia. russia strongly opposes this system. so is the president saying i can t be seen catering to russian demands during an election year so wait until i m re-elected and i ll have more flexibility then? he may have decided it s not a good idea but if that s true it would still be a change. here the president is on the missile defense system in september, 2009. it deploys capabilities that are proven and cost effective and it sustains and builds upon our commitment to protect the u.s. homeland against long-range ballistic missile thr