administration, it was not, in other words, a rogue operation. evidence exists tying mr. christie with knowledge of the lane closures during the period when they were closed. this is a letter protesting his decision not to foot his legal bills. gich given the costs that wildstein is accruing, this is no small considerings. this could be looked as a bid for a plea deal disguised as a complaint about his legal bills. it contends explosive suggestions and says he is the man with the answers at the mysteries at the heart of the drama. he is saying, i know something, i ll talk. give me a deal. the same message that was conveyed when he responded to the state assembly s subpoena last month with reams of strategically redacted e-mails and texts. it is the message his lawyer
rollout. should they have let people really experience it and see if it s as bad as you say instead of shutting down the government and now that s the subject? it s always difficult making decisions. most of us ran for office, i ran for office because i was concerned about the overwhelming debt our country is accruing. a trillion dollars a year, we re borrowing a million dollars every minute. so i m worried about the overall financial picture of the country, and so whether or not it was a good strategic idea, i don t know, but when are we supposed to stand up and say, look, we re out of money and we re destroying this country by this burden of debt. and so i think you ve got to stand up, whether it s debt ceiling or whether it s continuing resolution, we have to talk about the big picture, and the big picture is not an immediate default, the big picture is this gradual bankruptcy that s occurring of this country. all right, senator paul, i ask you to stand by. we ll have more with
rollout. should they have let people really experience it and see if it s as bad as you say instead of shutting down the government and now that s the subject? it s always difficult making decisions. most of us ran for office, i ran for office because i was concerned about the overwhelming debt our country is accruing. a trillion dollars a year, we re borrowing a million dollars every minute. so i m worried about the overall financial picture of the country, and so whether or not it was a good strategic idea, i don t know, but when are we supposed to stand up and say, look, we re out of money and we re destroying this country by this burden of debt. and so i think you ve got to stand up, whether it s debt ceiling or whether it s continuing resolution, we have to talk about the big picture, and the big picture is not an immediate default, the big picture is this gradual bankruptcy that s occurring of this country. all right, senator paul, i ask you to stand by. we ll have more with
the health care rollout this week by many, many accounts did not go that well. we just talked about it with treasury secretary lew, and yet all the headlines are about the government shutdown. let me show you the front page of the lexington paper and you ll see the top headline says, feeling the shutdown. talks about the health care glitches with the website rollout. should they have let people really experience it and see if it s as bad as you say instead of shutting down the government and now that s the subject? it s always difficult making decisions. most of us ran for office, i ran for office because i was concerned about the overwhelming debt our country is accruing. a trillion dollars a year, we re borrowing a million dollars every minute. so i m worried about the overall financial picture of the country, and so whether or not it was a good strategic idea, i don t know, but when are we supposed to stand up and say, look, we re out of money and
all the pieces have to be there. that s why the unions are going to get what they want. that s why the supreme court thing is so important, if you take away a piece of this, it unravels like a ball of yarn. otherwise you give out health insurance to the other people and the pre-existing thing and all that. if i can add a point to jonas remark, the subsidies that are accruing for those that don t have health care are for those that don t have job, for those that been maybe unemployed below the poverty line and so forth. here we re talking with regard to labor s push is for those who already have jobs, have full health care from labor and so forth and there would be a double subsidy put to them. and that s the real sticking point which i don t think you ll see get a pass and then get through what they re asking for. gary b.? here s the irony. david mentioned that all these iterations we ve strengthened the law, we ve strengthened it so much that every group i can