Political conquences for what i was doing. I am an inspector general. It was one of the Staff Directors for one of the committees on the hill that we work with a lot. I dont want to name his name. He is no longer there. Tucker Political Considerations could have no bearing on this . Absolutely not. You are not a d or an r. You are an ig. Those are the letters that matter for you. This guy is just a pawn of the right. A shill of the right and attack the messenger. Tucker you heard complaints from the intelligence agencies, their information was on an unsecured server. You bring concerns to the congress and you are dismissed as a right wingplant . Absolutely. Thats a good point. The agencies were unhappy about what was going on. They were not happy their
information was not protected the way it should have been. This was seen as cavalier. When we heard about this to begin with, an unsecured server, we looked at each other and said who does that . What rules apply to that . Then a senator
accountability rider there. tucker: give us perspective. it strikes me as improper for a political campaign to coordinate with government agencies about a matter related to national security. is it? well, i think it s common, but different dealing with classified information which has a special standing in our system. national security implications. what this man was clearly was doing was trying to bring to the attention of the authorities on the hill something that a case where classified information had been badly mishandled. recklessly one might say. what he got was interference from a political campaign. that may have happened in the past, but it s never become public. i have never heard of it. i think is highly unusual. everybody said look, you have to