washington. chris stevens went there because the day he was sworn in hillary clinton directed him to make it a permanent out post and the first few months he couldn t do it because he had other commitments and he had to do it in september because he had to ask for money in the year. so he went to benghazi at hilary s direction. you remember the last time we were on your show. i said that it would be proven eventually that the accountability review bored that was headed up by ambassador was a coverup and everything that we have learned since then shows that it was. they didn t interview hillary clinton. now how can you hold accountable the department of state, when the one person responsible for all it s activities was never interviewed? what do they do? they discipline four under lings who had absolutely nothing to do what happened that night in libya. it s really quite embarrassing. how do you both respond to a double question, john kerry
washington. chris stevens went there because the day he was sworn in hillary clinton directed him to make it a permanent out post and the first few months he couldn t do it because he had other commitments and he had to do it in september because he had to ask for money in the year. so he went to benghazi at hilary s direction. you remember the last time we were on your show. i said that it would be proven eventually that the accountability review bored that was headed up by ambassador was a coverup and everything that we have learned since then shows that it was. they didn t interview hillary clinton. now how can you hold accountable the department of state, when the one person responsible for all it s activities was never interviewed? what do they do? they discipline four under lings who had absolutely nothing to do what happened that night in libya. it s really quite embarrassing. how do you both respond to a double question, john kerry
committee investigating last fall s terror attacks on u.s. facilities in libya has run out of patience. oversight and government reform committee chairman darrell issa is no longer asking state department bureaucrats to talk. mike emanuel fills us in. reporter: almost ten months after the benghazi attack ended with four americans dead, darrell issa issued subpoenas for four state department officials, from bureau of diplomatic immunity. they all worked in areas where accountability review board found deficiencies leading to lack of security. the top two were identified for transfers and sanctions. in the case of near east, the top two weren t held accountable.
capacity, those kinds of things. so i have been very clear since it wasn t our mandate, i didn t do the investigation. and i m not prepared or able to give you a thought on that. did you learn anything new in the hearings this week that you did not know at the accountability review board? i would say yes because i m always interested in seeing what s new. i honestly did not. as far as you are concerned you think benghazi has been investigated and that information put out to the public as thoroughly as possible? no. because the fbi is responsible for the criminal investigation. and that s ongoing. and i think you have to separate the two. ours was securities. theirs is criminal. that is yet to be done. we may find out much more. they re obviously interested in who perpetrated this, for what reasons? were they criminally culpable under u.s. law? those kinds of things, yep. okay. ambassador pickering, thanks for coming, appreciate it.
freedom. this past week the dreams that i had as a little girl in that small town were shattered. with me now is a member of the house oversight and government reform committee pennsylvania congressman pat me hahn. good evening, judge. great to be with you. thanks for being here. you were there as i was on wednesday. what s your take on gregory hicks and his recounting of that night in benghazi? i thought the testimony was compelling. first because he gave us a firsthand view of what went on, on the ground and the same view that this administration apparently didn t feel important enough to ask themselves in the real time that they were doing the accountability review. so his testimony not only gave us a real sense of the intensity of the moment and what he was trying to do to protect those individuals who are out there in harm s way, but it also, of