what we don t know is how many people were eligible to vote. we know a number of organisations, big ones natwest, john lewis, bmw terminated their membership so warrant voting. a number said they weren t going to engage with the process with microsoft said they would back the proposals. we re not quite clear how strong a mandate this is it s not entirely transparent but does tell us how many individual votes were available to be cast. 371 were cast there were 23 abstention, 93% of those that were cast. it s unclear how much of a ringing endorsement mandate this is. they will say that all of those who could vote 93% said let s move forward. the cbi still has value to us. the critical test will be whether the government accepts that the fact they ve now regained the fate of their members and will engage with this group put up for nearly 60 years has dussen 282
people think? i do not seem to care about what people think? people think? i think there is a comlete people think? i think there is a complete mistrust people think? i think there is a complete mistrust between - people think? i think there is a | complete mistrust between the government, the president and the people. it is why people do not vote, the level of abstention is tremendously high and i think that peoplejust do not tremendously high and i think that people just do not trust the government. and then they feel that there is a lack of quality because we are pushing this perform and at the same time we are not pushing against tax evasion and corruption and all those kind of problems that we need to fight against and especially tax evasion which is a big issue. there is an unbalanced situation. he big issue. there is an unbalanced situation. ., big issue. there is an unbalanced situation. . ., ., situation. he talks about lack of communication situation. he talks about lack
you think it will never stop. what is it do you think that it will never stop. what is it do you think that is it will never stop. what is it do you think that is making - it will never stop. what is it do you think that is making the i you think that is making the difference now? many governments in past years have tried to push through pension reforms and haven t succeeded. what is it about this government that made the difference was much is it the fact they don t seem to really care about what people think? i seem to really care about what peeple think? people think? i think there is alwa s people think? i think there is always mistrust. people think? i think there is always mistrust. a people think? i think there is always mistrust. a mistrust l people think? i think there is - always mistrust. a mistrust between the government, the president and the government, the president and the people. it s why they don t vote for the abstention is very high. i think that people d
their these fringe elements that try to sort of use the political dead space, the political dead space created by the abstention of the main unionist party from joining the power sharing government here because of their concerns over brexit it creates that sort of vacuum and void that these fringe groups can feed into. but when you talk to business leaders here, as we have been over the past few days, you get that sense that there s there is, and they feel that great sense of opportunity here. blind maker block and its boss, komac diamond, are at the cutting edge of their business will take orders up to 4 30, if any day and they ll be turned around the same day and or an object lesson on beating brexit impact on northern ireland, and there s going to holla. this one s going to zululand in the netherlands, netherlands. and then their palate is going to
the first of many thought it was impossible that powerful leaders like former president loss of itch and former president taylor and of rwanda and cambodia. the list goes on. that they would ever be subjected to the rule of law, and yet they were. some of them are in custody. carissa, no expectation obviously that vladimir putin would surrender or be arrested. did the icc give you a sense of how it intends to proceed legally? reporter: that is the question really, john. because the icc cannot have a trial of someone in abstention. but what they can do according to prosecutor hahn, and, again, this has not been done historically but there is legal precedent for it, is what they