i can t imagine scaramucci and kelly in any context, they re two people from completely different worlds, this is a man who joined the marines in 1970 in the vietnam war, he s a gold star father whose daughter works for the fbi, he s all about public service, he s not about making money and he s certainly not about wall street. th reporter: that s right, and the backdrop of all of that, and the difference is scaramucci was eyeing that position as chief of staff. so i think you re going to see general kelly, as andrew card was just talking about, make it very clear what the chain of command is, because he can t get engaged in those types of clashes and we saw anthony scaramucci take aim at general kelly. priebus is out, but bannon is still here, and given general
and all of these accounts taken out of the state department and put in the hands of either bannon, jared kushner or others at the white house. the president himself saying that tillerson was wrong in recertifying iran as complying, according to all the weapons inspectors around the world in complying with the limited frame work of the nuclear agreement and saying the next time this comes up in 90 days that won t be the case. i think if you re mattis or tillers tillerson, you may be thinking you have an ally that you can go to. and i think the question is whether or not that works, the president allows that to work, he winds up really listening to kelly and whether he empowers him to make decisions and so we just don t really know at this stage. with the new chief of staff, josh, what happens to speechwriters, the whole communications staff should be reporting to the chief of staff and that s where the discipline
they said anthony would get the job over they are dead. this speaks to being in a room and you find out your bosses hired somebody that normally, your job description would be part of hiring and firing, what does this do to the relationship within the inner circle of the president? i don t know about bannon, and i don t realize because of bannon and priebus have had an odd relationship. there are times when they ve been at each other s throats especially early in the presidency. there are times and they seem to get along better. this strikes me as being more of a blow to the prestige and standing of reince priebus because as chief of staff, not to say he s in control of the staff or that he has signed off,
have a doctrine, he is flexible. jared kushner, his son-in-law, is exploiting that, and saying, hey look, we ve got to get some order around here. bannon has been clear. he says he wants to tear everything down and replace it later. that s reflected in that s palace scquabbles. i m not sure if it is all that important. considering the things that people don t like about bannon, donald trump has been doing for decades, the nationalism, the willingness to blow up the left/right paradigm. it is significant that he represents a key constituents, and he needs to stay in touch with the establishment types that are represented well by jared kushner, the so in law.
have a doctrine, he is flexible. jared kushner, his son-in-law, is exploiting that, and saying, hey look, we ve got to get some order around here. bannon has been clear. he says he wants to tear everything down and replace it later. that s reflected in that s palace scquabbles. i m not sure if it is all that important. considering the things that people don t like about bannon, donald trump has been doing for decades, the nationalism, the willingness to blow up the left/right paradigm. it is significant that he represents a key constituents, and he needs to stay in touch with the establishment types that are represented well by