said on both sides when they were going through their confirmation process, that it was already established law. this texas precedent, right, do you think that this tell us anything about the court vis-a-vis the mississippi case that they re considering? that s a really important question, jose, and the answer is, it doesn t tell us a thing. because they weren t deciding what texas was doing was really right to make an end run around the supreme court to bulletproof their law that would make it near impossible for a woman to get an abortion, so they didn t have to deal with the issue of whether or not abortion wouz constitutional, whether or not they could regulate her right to choose her bodily autonomy before a fetus was 27 weeks or viable. what that means here is only but it s important, i don t want to lose this point. it is important.