However the U.S. Supreme Court rules in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization , current trends may result in more abortion complications, writes Ingrid Skop, M.D., in the summer issue of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons .
abortion. but iuds turn out to be one of the most effective ways of having contraception. and they are expensive. they are between $500 and $1,000. so a lot of times women can t afford to have them. from a lot of healthy, younger women, contraception is the most important health cost that they ve got. and so this is a big deal. and paul clement, for the hobby lobby, admisted it would be if he wins, the exemption would be true for all contraception, not just for ones deemed to be abortifacients. rachel maddow drilled down on the fact that cardinal dolan in new york said publicly that, well, this doesn t really matter because you can get contraceptions at any convenience store which ignores the fact that contraception is something that a woman is prescribed by a doctor and it is a medical procedure, a medical
abortifacients for their employees. and on the other side, the administration says this is the law. we will have preventive care for everybody. we have standards for what is preventive care. and that includes contraceptive care and we deem none of these to be abortifacients so they have all been approved by the fda. you can t leverage your employees by imposing your rights on them. that s the administration s point of view. it s also a lot of women s rights point of view. but it s a humongous case because this is the first time if the supreme court rules for the hobby lobby folks it will be the first time that a for-profit corporation has claimed a religious exemption to comply with a generally applicable law. waivers already for religious organizations, for the churches, for religious non-profits.