this is about power and corruption. nothing less. judge jeanine: it s amazing, the excuses they use that we are racist. we allow people to come in from all other parts of the world. but we are racist when we couldn t know who they are, what they are, but my understanding is mexico is helping us somewhat by keeping many of them there until they can legally apply for asylum. what do you know about that? let s be clear about the real issue here. we can ignore national security for a second. you listed the issues. but think about the really compassionate arguments. the democrats say they are the empathetic ones, they are the compassionate ones. then why don t they care about the girls. 25% of the girls trafficked
schumer said, schumer demands trump aban don t wall. senator schumer, we are not going to abandon the wall, we are going to build the wall until all those americans who want us to abandon the wall and open up the border, that s what there is fight is about, we don t agree with you. mark andor jim and matt deserve the credit for getting the president in a good good spot. we need more money for the wall along the border. schumer wants to abandon the wall, we want to build it. that s what this fight is all about it s a silly, petty fight on behalf of democrats. they voted for $25 billion for the wall in border security in february. judge jeanine: but they won t allow for the building of a concrete wall. there was an 8-month pregnant woman who scaled that fence so
across the border are raped on the way here. why don t they care about the minors. they will show us photographs from the obama administration putting children in cages. do they know 10,000 of the minors were handed to the coyotes by their parents. if you want to protect the young girls and protect children, build the wall. be on our side of the argument. but they couldn t care less. they don t care about the immigrants, it s only about votes. that s how cynical the democrats are. judge jeanine: what i think is it s now in the senate. and what needs to be done is every senator who is against the wall, in their particular state, they need to meet the victims of crimes committed by illegals, homicides, felonies, whatever,
nancy and chuck, you don t want to put a wall up to stop that? we have spent tens of billions of dollars to fight heroin. but you don t want to spend $5 billion to put up a wall to top heroin for good? nancy and chuck, you beau know this year i.c.e. agents seized enough fentanyl to kill he person in the united states. you don t want a wall to stop it. don t you want to top the human traffickers,ck the child smugglg and the coyotes raping young women, claiming they are families? isn t this what he law abiding american wants? what is with this open border nonsense. and you call us racist. heartless and cruel. i ll tell you what s heartless. the number of americans killed
be signed on march 1st. that was last wednesday but that was, again, pushed off after the president delivered his joint address to congress. something that was praised by pundits that the administration seized on and want to have his its moment, essentially. we will get more details on this more-of-more formally at some point toot but nod clear when the president will sign it. thank you. we want to bring in msnbc chief legal correspondent ari melber on the travel ban. word given that this one comes out today. where do the all lawsuits stand from the first one? 40 plus pending lawsuits. the administration s argument, which they have made in court, is that this new ban will functionally replace and rescind the old one and wipe out the old suits. they literally told the california appeals court has overseen the blockage of the ban don t worry about it a new one is coming and change everything. whether is this a game-changer