they re heading into a box canyon now. it s something else entirely to sabotage a plan with a chance of succeeding and pretend to have leverage that exists only in a world of town hall applause lines and fund raising letters. that s out there by the wall street journal. backed up today by karl rove. this is dangerous territory. don t be bringing down the government. don t be causing the government to become a dead beat. let me say, i think that we can survive a government shutdown for a couple days. that s not that big of a deal. it s stupid politically. defaulting on our debt is catastrophic. and so i think that there s two things there. i think that the republicans the conservatives have taken their eye off the ball. obama care is bad, but they lost the focus on the spending that we ve got to do. obama care is part of that, but we ve got a bigger entitlement problem to deal with.
shutdown now would have much worse fallout than the one in 1995. back then seven of the government s 13 appropriations bills had been signed into law already. so most of the government was untouched by the shutdown. but this time no appropriation bills have been signed into law. so no discretionary spending is in place for any part of the federal government. washington won t be able to pay military families or any other federal employee. tuesday offered this rebuke of the ideology. they re heading into a box canyon now. it s something else entirely to sabotage a plan with a chance of succeeding and pretend to have leverage that exists only in a world of town hall applause lines and fund raising letters. that s out there by the wall street journal. backed up today by karl rove. this is dangerous territory. don t be bringing down the government. don t be causing the government
case where he tried to stop a fight, was attacked. defendant backed up, brandished a gun. aggre aggressor continued to approach. defendant shot him. and that was where the court reversed the conviction on that, suggesting that the judgment of acquittal should have been granted. the hernandez/ramos case of 496 72nd 837, again cited in jenkins gives some good insight into a somewhat similar fact scenario. in that case, evidence was there that the defendant took some effort to ward off the attack or end it without violence. the state s witnesses in that case uniformly identified the victim as the aggressor. we don t have we have one eyewitness in this case, john good, i think, would present a
thompson 5527224. that s an aggravated battery case where he tried to stop a fight, was attacked. defendant backed up, brandished a gun. aggressor continued to approach. defendant shot him. and that was where the court reversed the conviction on that, suggesting that the judgment of acquittal should have been grant ed. the hernandez/ramos case, again cited in jenkins, gives some good insight into a similar fact scenario. in that case, evidence was there that the defendant took some effort to ward off the attack or end it without violence. the state s witnesses in that case uniformly identified the victim as the aggressor.
they d watch but not a warn but it dipped down, for four minutes, backed up, and shrouded in rain and you can not see it and the folks that, like a lady i was with yesterday, she her it, went ideally to the bathtub, took her two children under her arm, sheltered them, and protected them from the debris, the house collapses, she is tine and her kids fine, she knew to get in 9 bath item, get in the basement, and don t mess around when the conditions are around. neil: we are getting word, governor, and this is video from indiana, a lot of people have been asking, this town that is completely gone, marysville, indiana, with 1 mix 900 residents, completely gone, buildings have been decimated and houses, what was the structure of a town, that is