vice president as i outlined in the book, doctor birx she refused to come and then to the media and even to the house has complained that they were parallel strings of information that she wasn t aware of. she was not excluded from the meetings, she refused to come whether she was threatened or felt that she could not stand up to people who are the experts doing the research. i m not sure i do what i speculate on her motivation except to say it s not the motivation of a knowledgeable scientist speak what exactly, it s written as so many stunning details in your book. it s really important people buy it and read it. i m not just saying that because i think you re great and you were right all along. it s an important historical document. the history of this they have to rewrite the history, trump messed it all up and saying
understand the complexities of immigration law, the burden of proof and possible defenses against deportation? the short answer is, they cannot. sarah burke joins me now. judge, i can t thank you enough for being with me this morning, and for shining a light on something that many people aren t aware of, but that happens more than many would think. you just wrote this op-ed where you describe how little kids have to defend themselves in court, without parents or even representation. how does this happen? well, unfortunately, it happens all too often. the real problem is that immigration is a civil proceeding, it s not a criminal proceeding. the only right to universal representation is in criminal proceedings. and therefore, that distinction
the president saying the u.s. hadn t reached out and laid the groundwork for that with the french was, quote, clumsy. it was something he wasn t aware of. he told that to the president shortly after that deal. i think the main thing is what it showed for the last couple weeks, which have been intensive for discussions. a 12-word joint statement came out of that meeting. that is detailed, that is policy, and it underscores the policy to change the dynamic in the last couple weeks. with our oldest ally, it s important. phil mattingly, thanks. let me bring in alitim vita.
an act of terrorism, what was the motive for this attack on sir david. but it means to get the most amount of resources there and it is now. so things which would be going on at the moment is a 25 year old man who was taken into custody and arrested at the scene, which indicates the suspect wasn t someone that apprehended. his devices, assuming he is mobile phones or computers, will be interrogated by specialist officers looking for clues as to his motive, and if it ll be terrorism they ll be looking for evidence of mind set and ideology, which is always a critical part of these investigations in the early stages. the second thing is a team and specialist officers will be going to his home, they ll be conducting the most incredible search you could ever imagine, i ve known searches involving counterterrorism officers which have gone in for many, many
think he was liked right across the whole of parliament, as has been demonstrated by the many attributes that have been paid to him today. . does this cause you to reflect on security as an mp? you ve been in mp since the early 90s. since the early 90s. that s right. it s since the early 90s. that s right. it s obvious since the early 90s. that s right. it s obvious he since the early 90s. that s right. it s obvious he something - since the early 90s. that s right. l it s obvious he something someone since the early 90s. that s right. - it s obvious he something someone is always a para aware of, but it is part of thejob always a para aware of, but it is part of the job that we are available and we should be. i have a meeting with the chief superintendent for north essex this morning to talk about general policing matters, and the subject of security came up, and we are aware and we take precautions. but at the end of the day, it is incredibly important that mps remai