law does not make it so in life. yeah, it was a master class. it s an extraordinary account of the history of the united states. it s a counter to the argument in wait in which they re reading the 14th amendment, the equal protection clause a a basis for kind of color blind law. she in so many ways makes the argument or the claim very straightforward. america doesn t look like it looks by mistake. ole miss doesn t look the way it looks by mistake. princeton doesn t look the way it looks by mistake. it s the result of deliberate policy. and if we re going to enter a world where we are not defined biracialinequality, then we re going to have to be as deliberate in dismantling it. he made a point, he would go so far as to say the supreme court is antidemocratic. he did make a point saying as with dobbs, it is way out of step with the majority of the american people.
are created equal endowed by their creator. it s the uniqueness of america. we never fully lived up to it, we never walked away from it. this court seems to say that s not always the case. giving states power that we fought a war over in 1960. you know, i just think it s this is not your father s republican party. well, and to that point, roe and casey are decided with justices appointed by democrats and republicans, and these opinions that land outside the range of public opinion in our country are super conservative majority decisions. they re 6-3 on dobbs, they re 6-3 on affirmative action. does it require does your love and reverence for institutions. before i got elected while i put together a group of constitutional scholars to try