Works in the Nonprofit Sector that has a contract, i assume, with the city to be able to give advice on how this would impact nonprofits that would fall under this category. I just want to reiterate, just because our office did spend quite a bit of time putting together a policy that impacted many of our employers, the fair chance act which i coauthored with supervisor malia cohen, that was a tenmonth process to put together the actual specifics of what the fair chance ordinance would look like, and this is how it actually impact our employees in not doing the background checks at first application. And because of the length of time it took to meet with all of our stakeholders and make sure that we were taking everyones input into our ordinance, for me i guess why i would push on why we should pass this now and get the process started is that in order for a tenmonth process to work out between now and september, we really need to get the equal Pay Advisory Committee going in november.
Little cleaner. Okay. And i believe that was seconded by supervisor tang. Thats correct. And, colleagues, can we take that motion to amend without objection . Without objection that should be the case. [gavel] and then now on the motion to continue this item to november the 25th, colleagues, can we do that without objection or do we need a roll call . Without objection as amended, mr. President. Im sorry . As amended. As amended. Without objection this item as amended will be continued to november the 25th. [gavel] and with that, why dont we go to item 28. Item 28 is an ordinance amending the police code to repeal the prohibition on entering or remaining within a 25foot buffer zone of a Reproductive Health care facility; to prohibit individuals from following or harassing others within 25 feet of the entrance to such a facility; to prohibit impeding access to the door of such a facility; and to prohibit excessive noise through yelling or amplification of sound within 50 feet of such fa
Decades. And that we could send one back to committee where we can do the clean up language, move forward to the full board. But if supervisor tangs motion to a date certain takes precedence, then i dont want to create any more process and that seems to be where the direction is going. Ill withdraw my motion. Okay. So, at this time there is just one file. Supervisor tang has made a motion to continue that one file to november the 25th. Is there a second to that motion . Seconded by supervisor cohen. Colleagues, do we need a roll call or can we take that without objection . Supervisor kim. Im sorry. Does that mean we cant maytion a motion to amend . Because supervisor tang made a motion to continue to a date certain. That motion takes precedence over a motion to amend. Unless there is objection. Just a friendly, if we could do the motion to amend prior to the motion to continue. Kay, thats where we are right now. Through the chair, i would be okay with that, absolutely. Okay, without ob
Or is proprietary is really a factual determination. So, the hrc will be looking at whatever data they have if there is a sunshine request, working with my office to determine whether any whether that information is protected trade secret or protected proprietary information. And if it is, hrc Wont Disclose it. So, this amendment, i think, could be described as clarifying that hrc will not turn over information thats protected from disclosure, but the ordinance would not override the sunshine ordinance. Thank you. And i have some questions about the legislation. From my perspective, its clear that this is a board of supervisors that supports equal pay as supervisor kim ha stated. I just want to make sure that whatever we choose to do its responsible, its substantive and it doesnt just Pay Lip Service to the problem. ~ has i know that several years back when Sexual Harassment cases were coming before the courts there were a number of Sexual Harassment cases, a number of changes to a lot
Not understanding how the systems will be put together in order to actually collect the data in a way that builds a case against someone who is violating the law. So, im trying to understand where that exists in the legislation. Im also trying to understand the specifics of the resources from the various departments who will be required to actually implement what were asking to do. So, it would be helpful to know if hrc is going to are we going to add another fte to hrc in order to help facilitate this process . I dont want to just pass legislation to pass legislation. I want to pass legislation that actually works for the people that were trying to make it work for. I think that im unclear as someone who is being asked to support this, im unclear as to how this is actually going to help with the situation. And i do appreciate supervisor kims comments especially because, you know, its definitely something we should be doing, we should be moving in this particular direction, but i also