to remove them or detain them. we need to dramatically reduce the legal avenues of challenge. but i m askin: if legal avenues of challenge. but i m asking if people legal avenues of challenge. but i m asking if people are legal avenues of challenge. but i m asking if people are sent legal avenues of challenge. but i m asking if people are sent from - legal avenues of challenge. but i m asking if people are sent from this | asking if people are sent from this country to rwanda, what would happen to them once they are there? is it safe to send refugees to rwanda from britain? you sound convinced of that. i britain? you sound convinced of that. ., britain? you sound convinced of that. . , . britain? you sound convinced of that. . . ., ., i, that. i am convinced of that, yes. in 2018 a that. i am convinced of that, yes. in 2018 a group that. i am convinced of that, yes. in 2018 a group of that. i am convinced of that, yes. in 2018 a group of refugees - that. i am convinced of th
the u.s. computers saying at the moment enormous amount of chinese satellites, one wouldn t think are engaged in spying purposes. well that s not. no i think what s different here is there is something kind of brazen about the fact that this balloon, being in american airspace. therefore, violation of our sovereignty. and the timing, granted we don t know exactly how long it takes for a balloon that s dispatch from the chinese government to reach the american airspace, but this happening at the exact time that tony blinken was will be traveling to china, to try to reset relations, which have obviously been deteriorating for years now. it s that combination of a kind of brazen nature of this balloon being literally visible, and that may have been a mistake by the chinese. we don t know, coupled with the time iran secretary blinken s visit that i think has kicked this up above what would be a fairly normal case of the chinese trying to spy on the united states, just as downside,
live revelation from deep inside the manhattan district attorney s office at the height of investigations into donald trump s finances. msnbc has obtained excerpts of a new book, people versus donald trump, an inside account versus former prosecutor mark pomerantz who quit the da s office in frustration last year when any decision was made to not indict trump at that time. in the book, comrades expresses his relief that quote, donald trump had committed serious crimes and the da s office could present a solid case in court that would lead to a guilty verdict. joining us right now, tim o brien senior executive editor and host of the crash course podcast at bloomberg opinion. he s also nimbus nbc political analyst and author of the 2005 book, trump nation, the art of being the donald.
tim, if one of the lead investigators here came to this conclusion, why were no charges filed? because their office was deeply divided on this, lindsey. you know, all when brad came into the manhattan da s office at the sort of tail end of this previous investigation that cyrus fans had overseen. and, cy vance left the office and love this investigation essentially and alvin bragg s hand. on the decision on whether not to indict trump. it s a criminal investigation, the hurdle they had in and criminalist occasions is to prove that the tarp it s knew that they were committing a crime and it s felt intent. part of the movement through factually prosecutors in the office felt that they didn t have enough evidence to bring that case. mark pomerantz and those in his side of the aisle believe they. did i think there was a good faithful belief on both sides that they should do it, and
should into. it ultimately, those things are sort of subjective based on the quality of the evidence and the ability to win a. case so i don t think that it is just a matter of alvin bragg turning his back on a prosecutable case. but i also think pomerantz has some legitimate criticism about how aggressive the office was ultimately willing to be. but it s not that black and white, it s not that cut, enjoy it s a tough thing. i think it s interesting now that brags off seems to have rekindled its investigation. really, i think turning the screws on some of trump s former executives who possibly flipped him against. them pomerantz, as you pursue says he personally poured over trump starters and said what is not a pattern of overstatement of acids. here are two examples you highlighted. trump s golf club in jupiter florida, they had 5 million youtube summer 2012. and 62,000,006 months later. and then there s the chart plex apartment where