brian. well, i mean, you ve talked about republicans, the republican, i believe this came from was house speaker mike johnson, when you when he suggested as intercourse, he was also the one who was leading the effort to get so many other house republicans to try to get the supreme court to help in their efforts to overturn the election. but any criminal case cool cases are a tragedies really no crime has been committed, committed. there s people who have been victimized, people have lost out here. there s not a tremendous financial loss, but there s a loss in the voters, in the system and loss of confidence in the voting system. so there are a lot of victims here, but another tragedy here is the fact that they re very highly placed political people who, have joined in on the mockery of the system, who have undermined confidence in the system, which in and of itself has a tremendous tragedy they also should be held accountable in some way. do you think it is undermined what has it
place. but what did you make of this? what i made it is this that all the arguments to be made for getting to the supreme court our very cool republican talking points but they have no basis in law, and they certainly have no basis. in fact, as a judge is pointed out, they have no there s no procedural mechanism to get those arguments between before the supreme court, particularly now, what what they do tell you about if i m judge or sean is to look at this and say, this is when when he comes up pre-sentencing in july 11, is that this is a defendant who doesn t get it. who isn t contrite who who has ridiculed the system who has made a mockery of the system? has been complicit and others and violating a gag order has violated a gag order himself. and in fact, the only thing he has going for him at the time of sentencing is that the served as president of united states, which is very unique. but he also has so many other factors. on the other side of the equation that obama defense law
they moderate get it and what that looks like. because obviously you ll there are numbers that show that they re one and 14 agers who were on twitter. and you think about younger siblings or people who are on it. and you kinda was this hub for discussion and arguing and ideas and can they really moderate it though randomly? this is one of the easier things to moderate specifically because the amount of skin that s shown is very easy for ai and machines to identify as being a nude person. same thing by the way, goes for child exploitative material. we have databases that all of the social media platforms refer for too, when the fbi catches this type of material, they uploaded to a data, the database, the platforms have access to it. and so when you try to upload something that matches what the fbi or law enforcement officials has. it s automatically block. so this actually isn t a huge issue from that perspective. overall. i mean, you and i have talked so much about x since elon mus
captioning bronchi by meso book.com our firm only represents mesothelioma victims and their families. if you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelial kalisa. now breaking tonight, president biden is sharpening his attacks against former president donald trump calling him what he now is. it convicted felon. this was behind closed doors tonight at a fundraiser in connecticut, where the president told donors in the 20 2024 campaign is entering what he did describe his uncharted territory, saying, and i m quoting president biden now for the first time in american history, a former president, that is a convicted felon is now seeking the office of the presidency. but as disturbing as that is more damaging, is the all-out assault that donald trump is making on the american system of justice this isn t the same trump who got elected in 2016, biden said he s worse. i
decide whether or not there was enough evidence for the case to have gone forward. the court of appeals cannot they can only look at constitutional questions if they look at a constitutional question and take the appeal, i don t even know that there is a constitutional question. but if there is the only way the united states supreme court can get it after the court of appeals reviews it is if it is a matter of federal constitutional law, which is rare in a state case. so i don t see it. so what s the likelihood here? i don t think there s a likelihood at all there is any chance there s always a chance it s right and we have an interesting supreme court. so there s always a chance that s powerful people involved, but in terms of the mechanism that exists in state law and federal law right now, unless there is a clear violation of federal constitutional law, which no one seems to have been able to articulate. most notably, the defendant without that, it doesn t get to the supreme court