prosecution is forced now to defend george anthony. that is what they have to do tomorrow. remember since this is a circumstantial evidence case they have to rebut the reasonable hypothesis of innocence which baez raised. they have a problem there because they haven t really gone through and proved that the drowning didn t happen. that s their burden. yet wendy murphy, george anthony does not come across as a total sleazebsleazebag. no. i saw him weeping. i have known him i have talk to do him now over these past three years. i know that he is squarely in the gun sights of the defense but doesn t the jury have to see him as a a dye bog cal sleazy character? i thought beaz did the same
prosecution i believe this judge was, i also belief and i know you disagree with me, this case is going to be appealed successfully on various issues when it comes back for a retrial after they throw out the statements that were not mir ran diesed after they throw out a pro tess can animation that was so highly prejudicial. i believe they plead her with time served. you could argue there were appellate issues here whether or not they said it was admitted. she will be convicted the only place she is walking to is death row. you can argue no dna or no fingerprints. there s another no you have to argue no giving the benefit to the defense for throwing her in a swamp and have the evidence washed away. guilty. no cause of death.
not george anthony. even cindy anthony tried. yo saw that. lee anthony at times was resistant. you didn t see announce of that from george. george cares about george. no one else. those are n the actions of a father. throughout the course of this triaas he testified he didn t act like a father. there were times when he would actually smile there were times he thought it was funny to spar with me. you see jose bi baez attacki grandpa. famed forensic pathologist dr. michael baden. is this a classic case of de flexion? remember geraldo tomorrow
they have been emotionally charged with ashtashton s closi statement so they will want to convict her of something. aggravated manslaughter. now let me go first to maria hill. i think the prosecution did a fabulous job. i don t think jose bias should have brought in the accidental drowning image that s where he made their mistake. he will come back with murder 1. why? you think they have gone to the lofty level of proving beyond a reasonable doubt to the decision of all other really they have a case where they can send this woman to the death chamber? i know i am the odd man out. i respectfully disagree with all of my colleagues here. you can be as firm in your opinions as you want to. wendy murphy we trust your judgment what do you think is going on here? i put a lot of elements out
there. i know you think my theorys are crazy. i read the witness statements i didn t wake th make that up abo child porn stuff. every other case i have done with you over the past 15 years what matters most motives and opportunity and intent but motive and opportunity. we have what for motive? she goes out partying so she killed her kids. we have blockbuster represent ago movie spending the night with her boyfriend. motive doesn t fly and the jury saw the videotape. we have evidence she wasn t with wendy and the child on wasn child on the 16th or 17th. got to go wendy. [ male announcer ] this.is the network