dawning for that change in approach, that dawning realisation over that weekend? was it the information from sa-e weekend? was it the information from sage irr weekend? was it the information from sage in relation to the workings, and the sage in relation to the workings, and the work done by imperial college? and the work done by imperial college? was it of the cmo? was it mr cummings? what was the push, where mr cummings? what was the push, where was mr cummings? what was the push, where was it coming from? the fact that ou where was it coming from? the fact that you cite where was it coming from? the fact that you cite so where was it coming from? the fact that you cite so many where was it coming from? the fact that you cite so many examples - where was it coming from? the fact i that you cite so many examples shows there was a convergence of thinking in different institutions from different individuals about the need to act. i was not aware of niall ferg
remember, whether that passage was put to sir chris and whether he accepted put to sir chris and whether he accepted it was a fair reflection because accepted it was a fair reflection because it seemed to me that he appeared because it seemed to me that he appeared to be advising against any measures. appeared to be advising against any measures, including lockdown. the aeneral measures, including lockdown. tue: general proposition was measures, including lockdown. ti9: general proposition was put to measures, including lockdown. ti9 general proposition was put to him, but not that sentence, so my lady is quite right, there is a mission issue as to where is your measurement measures or the lockdown measure. it measurement measures or the lockdown measure. :, , , :, :, measure. it meant things short of lockdown like measure. it meant things short of lockdown like social measure. it meant things short of lockdown like social distancing, i lockdown like social distan
intervention when it comes from the united states, a change in strategy. the secretary of state defended that saying there is a clear working strategy in place. and step by step, i am confident that the momentum will pick up. so i thank you all and particularly again am confident that over the next days paris which knows how to rebound, will do so. president and the white house say they refuse to engage in another long-term, long-large group ground operation in a foreign country, much like they say they don t want to repeat iraq or afghanistan. though the opponents of the white house are saying they are not calling for that. it s embarrassing when he continues to set up a straw man saying there s either nothing done or 100,000 troops. no one that i know of is recommending 100,000 troops. we are recommending an international coalition of arab and european countries with
not? u.s. news and world report obtained in over 100 slide presentation that the bush campaign gave to a donor. i think we can put one on the screen for you. negative information about marco rubio, potential attacks on marco rubio. so the question here for the bush campaign as they struggle to get back into this race is do you go hard after marco rubio and risk the blow back that comes with that? or do you try to take the high road here and fit doesn t work out, at least you left the campaign on a positive note? so that s the dilemma for the bush people. ron allen is live at the white house with what seems to be a change as far as boots on the ground, specifically in syria. ron? good afternoon. yes. what we understand is the administration is going to announce later today a change in strategy, a change in tactics in syria. and you re right.