their government and its agencies to protect it. but are they really doing that? there s growing evidence that equal justice in the u.s. is beingl justhe eroded, replacd with a system of selective and political prosecutionsed wi agencies like the fbi and the department of justice are agg citizenss they re supposed to protect. under president biden, the justico e department s prosecuted a number of his direct political rivals. there s noe m more obvious exal than donald trump. of course. he s been federally indicted ina the classified documents probe. now, to be clear, you can disagreer with tru with trump ss and believe what he did was wrong. d wai do. but this is a president s main opponent and his allies, like steve bannon, peter navarro, rudy giuliani, they ve all been targeted varro ru, too.oper and maybe that s all right and proper, but it s in the interestin the of democracyy least question it. many believe these agencies have become unaccountable and too powerful. wh
pointed that out. and they said a, fondr examph they did not find a single a single posatt that i did thatr was actually factually erroneous, not one. son noto they made up a new m called mal information, which was information that is true,ics but it would discourage people from complying with the countermeasures. and that s what they applied to me. i was not misinformation applier disinformation. i was being taken down fromma information and information. i mean, category and facebook and twitter sentitter emails saying this is whatse he s saying is true. but we understand thatwe it s going to you know, it s going to decrease compliance with these official h . you re getting a lot of traction at the moment. i mean, your pollingouot great.y you re everywhere in the media. people are talking about you. yu if you do become president of d the united states, one of the key challenges you may face immediately will be the ukraine war of is still raging.
letter saying that a lot of hunter biden laptop story wass o baloney with russian disinformation . actuall it was nothing. it was nothing of the sort that actually, ironically turned outi to be disinformation, disinformation, in a way, the global pandeminf c has surely shown us that, yeah, you can go along with believing the science, but often the sonse perform dramatic u-turnsnc. so what does that mean about the original people who challengedleng the erroneous scientific information as you were doing? n, aoui don t agree with a lot f the stuff that you were saying, but i respect your right to say iti t, and i certainly thinkhan you were right to challenge and try and geget to the truth. but when the science changes so dramatically ovechr things like the efficacy of masks or indeed the ability of the covid vaccine to prevent transmission and so on, what is disinformation? who decides that? and what happens if the originalo deci so-called ace information turns out to be disinformation?
pr wou alot more on that story . probably could have swung the election. i mean, the election was tie the . swung and so these things have real consequences. yeah, you can make that argumentings hav. pects th one of the you know, the other aspects of what is note certainly not discussed today, but that, you know, the involvement ofin the ciaso and the cia also sharedd a portal with the fbi in censoring us and they were not just censoring, you know, hunter biden. and they were and, you know, me with my with my information on vaccines and lockdowns, a bu etc.. but they were also instructed to censotructer, in one case,ard a parody of president biden whi presides wife they did ne on the internet, which is which is ridiculous. which is ridiculous. but i mean, it shows thatthin the whole thineallg is really messed up. the other thin g as you had 50 cia officials and former officials, but current officials who signed a public