or form. and i said this the other night when i hosted hannity that it is so, to me, stunning that a supreme court justice would come out and push back at the president of the united states. you know, the president is political. the supreme court justice is not, especially the chief justice. let s talk about the ninth circuit and what we have got and how this circuit is, you know, considered almost a circus given their decisions. right. well, we call it the 9th circus his or her it stretches from alaska to almost the equat eequate eequat. we can t even get en banc hearing. we are stacked up and can t even get en banc hearing and quite frankly arizona and the inner mountain west, we are not really copasetic with the california mentality and coastal mentality. i have a bill to split up the ninth circuit.
of the executive branch as laid out in the united states. judge jeanine: with the supreme court judge getting involved it s almost a tacet approval of the district judges say i will enjoin the country. anyway, president trump yesterday continued his attack on the far left ninth circuit of appeals. look at this. we are getting some terrible decisions from the ninth circuit as usual. and it s a shame. it s a shame. it s a disgrace, frankly. essentially they are legislating. they are saying what to do. some judge sitting in some location very far away is telling our incredible military and law enforcement what to do and it s not right. hopefully we have shown some light on the ninth circuit. i know that chief justice roberts, john roberts has been speaking a little bit about it. judge: i got to tell you, congressman, when i was a judge, we never ever got involved in any way, shape,
immigration is now for many people the number one issue. how is it that they keep going to the 9th circuit or courts where, you know, it will move up to the 9th circuit and then some local, i m calling him a local district judge gets to do a temporary restraining order that enjoins the whole country? how does that work? that s exactly right. yeah. you have partisan hacks out there finding the most liberal judge they can find to then level a decision that rebukes the power of the executive branch. the president has that power over immigration. that was decided in trump vs. hawaii when the supreme court literally said he has the power to do this. it was after a judge in hawaii unilaterally struck down the temporary travel ban. the supreme court, of course, upheld that now have you another liberal activist judge doing the same thing with this asylum executive order. it s forum shopping. it s activist judges and judiciary wielding power they do not have to rebuke the legitimate mayo maur
we can t seem to get any angst on it we have california representatives because they want their portion of california out of the 9th circuit and into the 12th circuit. that s really what s going on. judge jeanine: kayleigh what the congressman is propose something plight up 9th circuit now 29 justices. the largest in the country. what he was referring to is the fact in his bill that the 9th circuit doesn t reflect the values of the state that he is from. so he wants to get out of it. and, i mean, is that something that we have seen done in the past? the congressman is spot on. i think this is a great proposal. it makes a lot of sense. the 9th circuit doesn t just represent the area over which they rule, they don t represent the united states of america. they re the most overturned circuit for a reason. [laughter] it s a fact. and look at by the way i have got to say with justice roberts there, where was he being vocal when ruth bader