often such waves will occur in nature. what is the likelihood of a freak wave forming. previous estimates had suggested that the probability of finding a way higher than 10 meters in a heavy storm would only be 0.03 percent. but measurements show that giant waves occur much more frequently the actual chance of waves forming that are at least 10 meters high is closer to one percent. and that s the classical approach adheres to the theory that every wave has a certain energy that the energy of one wave can sometimes overlay that of another to form a particularly high wave and that the component waves each with their own energy can thereafter continue on their way for. newer approaches theorize that energy can
she is face-to-face with actual voters, they can kind of cut through all that noise and really listen to her. and she does have a real charisma in person. i don t think it plays as well on television. she s got a few ideas. a lot of people who complain about her complain about her wealth tax. it s a 2% tax levied on asset wealth over $50.03% levied on assets over $1 billion. i don t know a lot of people with $50 million in wealth. so the people who complain that she s trying to take everybody s money away. like alexandria ocasio-cortez when she talks about a 70% tax threshold, the margins are high. given how extreme it s become, it s remarkable if you just focus in on the top 57 75,000 families. now i will say there are some issues with the wealth tax as well. it may be very difficult to implement not just politically, it would be very controversial,
anything fraud-related. no evidence to that at this point. there was court rulings. the senator is right, but it had to do with public records, not voter fraud. you have them, including the president of the united states on his twitter account followed by 50 million people, claiming voter fraud where there is no evidence of voter fraud here. you have republicans basically repeating this talking point based on something unrelated. hitting reporting requirements but nothing related to changing the vote counts. the thing that s so bizarre is yes, these races are so close, but they re not so close they re likely to be overturned in a recount. remember 2000. that race was considerably closer. .03%. and it went down all the way to 538 or 537. whatever it was. and it was 0.03%. even here, the senate race is 0.15 pursage points. it s likely to be why is the president saying voter fraud
money. but commerce secretary says they re not going to notice. if you have a 10% tariff on another 200 billion, that s 20 billion a year. that s a tiny, tiny fraction of 1% total inflation in the u.s. because it s spread over thousands and thousands of products, nobody s going to actually notice it at the end of the day. really? well, joining me is fist of how is this possible. even if it s a little bit of money on a few product here and there, it adds up on the cost of the and what people need buy. it the analysis suggests the impact is probably 0.03% at the terrif range.
were gang members. you can t even round it up to one percent. who believes those lies? we have to start saying this. who is stupid enough who is dumb enough to believe lies that can be disproven within 30 seconds of a google search? people who want to believe those lies. that s the point of this. what we see are all the elements of classic strongman politics. we are seeing the attacks of the press and the appeal to the danger of minority groups that there are shadowy forces that are undermining our country, people coming from outside the country to change the culture. we see that time and time again through history. it is always ugly and always ends badly. kasie hunt, if you look at the poll, the numbers are showing some shifts. is there anybody in congress at