vocal of one we are happy and we will be very vocal when we are not. the same thing could not right? sean: $9.7 trillion debt increase over ten years? i thought they were the party of limited government! balance budgets! that s right. the republican party and the establishment have squandered the opportunities they ve had before when they had control of two or three branches of government and we will be onon them like white on rice. i m sure there are leftist socialists saying i just committed a micro-aggressionon right there. but we live in a different era now. thank god for that. sean: michelle malkin, good to see you. congrats on the tv series. coming up, one week from today, the long nightmare that is barack obama. it s over. it s done. donald trump will be your president. upe next, we will speak with kellyanne conway and then later tonight. donald trump is someone who is very insecure in his victory and i understand why, every day there are new developments, newr shoes d
the $9.7 trillion in the debt increase over ten years, and thirdly, paul ryan saying last night, this woman is not going to leave even though that is a law of the land. any of you three hearing about this? i ve got insurances that look, this is a vehicle, this $9.7 trillion in this budget. this is a vehicle. they promised me it will not end up beating us. no, you already agreed to these numbers. the freedom caucus. sean: it real quick, . we want you to look at broadband expansion, that is the primary infrastructure issue. there are ways for us to address that. i think we will do that. it will not having a negative impact. we have to get the debt and the deficit, the annual deficit dealt with.
the $9.7 trillion in the debt increase over ten years, and thirdly, paul ryan saying last night, this woman is not going to leave even though that is a law of the land. any of you three hearing about this? i ve got insurances that look, this is a vehicle, this $9.7 trillion in this budget. this is a vehicle. they promised me it will not end up beating us. no, you already agreed to these numbers. the freedom caucus. sean: it real quick, . we want you to look at broadband expansion, that is the primary infrastructure issue. there are ways for us to address that. i think we will do that. it will not having a negative impact. we have to get the debt and the
that is step one. the president-elect is exactly right. it will be better and cost less when we get rid of obamacare. we have to make sure we keep promise to the american people. let s do it all. every mandate, every regulation, everything a packed has to go. then we ll have a chance to make the market work and that is part of the replacement. getting rid of obamacare with repeal, so you can have a market work and bring down costs and provide affordable health care to the families across this country. sean: louie gohmert, a lot of conservatives are writing and tweeting out their concern about three things. trillion dollar infrastructure, without a plan to pay for it. they are concerned about increasing the debt over the next ten years, $9.7 trillion. there concerned that some remarks paul ryan made, any illegal immigrant that he wouldn t allow immigration officials to deport here. otherwise, not following the law. that s a current law of the
no one is offended by obamacare more than myself. i ve seen it up close, i ve seen it firsthand, i ll do anything to get rid of it. however, i don t want to have to vote for a budget that never balances and a budget that adds $9.7 trillion in debt in order to get to it. what i told my colleagues is, why don t we introduce a good budget? when the balances and then repeal obamacare? the rules and congress are you can t repeal it until you pass a budget. but what is and be a bad budget? we are not getting any democrats to vote for the budget. this is in a compromise with democrats. were going to vote for a budget. this is a republican product, why should it not be a vision of conservative budget, a fiscal conservatism russian mark why is it a budget that adds so much debt? tucker: that s a good question. you also said it could eventually lead for a tax to insurance companies. you wrote that. i understand that reasoning too.