and the last0oú of my life. i believe god was saying do you life or do you want a new one? if you say no i ll give you new life. to bemla÷ lhonest a new life even for five 3@ sounded moreqvp than the way i had been living. you see that now in retro suspect. were you conscious of that? of that presence? did you feel that presence? or just a strong instinct? probably for the first time to say no? no. i eo felt the presence of god telling memm+ñ this is it. you can choose the old life or the new life. and i will give it to you. like i said[ñst( idn t know if i was going to make it out of there pw i didn t know9?$ç if it wasrr goingz;[ to be five minutes or 50 years. but as soon as i chose not to do:@a÷ those drugs,%dw for me. %@hvá jbwnow? iwútz realize ashley smith wasn t in
severalptçhx years. it s are really become more and more obvious. what they have apparently been doing according to all the reports that we have seen is an increased amount of interrogatione> sure. i think first and foremost, dealing with mississippi poll watchers, the irony of this happening during the anniversary of freedom summer. 50 years agoñrñr the country wa dealing with voter intimidation and threats from the ku klux klan in mississippi. today we are dealing with this run are run-off. i can t imagine what the mississippi voters are 6it they have the highest black electorate. it s no mistake this is a 7í st that was covered by section 5 of the voting rights act and needed
requirement is unconstitutional. the governor is vowing to block the law that is set to take effect on january 1çst. pete williams is live. alabama, arizona, this is the third lawsuit that they filed against new measures and they enacted to crack down. how can we expect this legal battle to play out? like the other, i suspect. the government will go to a federal judge and said please block enforcement of part of the law. the judge will decide. it will go to an appeals court and the government makes the same claim and said the states are free to take steps to try to deal with illegal immigration and they can t pass laws that are at odds with federal policy and that under the constitution preempts the field. arizona s case got through to the supreme court and we are waiting to see if the supreme court will take the challenge over arizona s law that has been stopped.