but i don t think she s a natural. i think she s smart as hell. but the question is how does she she has to define herself. the democratic party s angry now. it s easy to fall into the column on the left and talk like elizabeth warren and be angry about wealth at the top. talk about the 1%. get really angry at like some labor guys have previously all the time. she could do that, but that will kill her for the general election probably. she also can t look too much like a moderate, like somebody s too nice and can t be the way things are, a rich woman. she has to find the right hybrid somewhere between a change agent and a person who can win the center in the election when it comes around. personally, if i were a campaign manager, i d be going for 55% in 2016, bring in the house bring back the senate, get things done. if she squeaks in, left wing candidate, 50.2%, she ll lose the house, lose the senate and they ll screw her. they ll hurt her as bad as they can.
determine what effect accept drinking has on body tissue. the monkeys thoroughly enjoy it. and finally, $124.6 million. that s how many single adults there are in america, outnumbering their married counterparts for the first time in recorded history. that has never happened before. single people ages 16 and older now account for 50.2% of the population. clayton? for eharmony. this morning we have news that your kids will be happy to hear. a growing number of schools across the country are banning homework. concerns among educators and parents have driven home schools to opt out of homework all together. is this the right move? here to discuss is psychologist jonathan fader, mothers jennifer and ella. you re on the side of this. extreme homework, get rid of it.
terms and limited the terms and the senate was actually made up of members appointed by the state legislatures. they would be appalled by career politicians and you can read their letters. you can read their writings. they expected the people to go home and retain the farms and stay as farmers and business men and so forth. they didn t believe in a permanent legislative class. as a matter of fact, professor rotunda has written that the house of representatives turns over less than the house of lords. you put that in the book. even in 2010. 85%, which was a wave election. we call it a tidal wave election. 85% still re-electedre-elected. some of them didn t run. we re cheering it. whereas, you know, in the 1800s, you had 50% turnover after 2 years. and 80% turnover after 4 years. from 1850 to 1898, in the book, turnover ra of 50.2%.
terms and limited the terms and the senate was actually made up of members appointed by the state legislatures. they would be appalled by career politicians and you can read their letters. you can read their writings. they expected the people to go home and retain the farms and stay as farmers and business men and so forth. they didn t believe in a permanent legislative class. as a matter of fact, professor rotunda has written that the house of representatives turns over less than the house of lords. you put that in the book. even in 2010. 85%, which was a wave election. we call it a tidal wave election. 85% still re-electedre-elected. some of them didn t run. we re cheering it. whereas, you know, in the 1800s, you had 50% turnover after 2 years. and 80% turnover after 4 years. from 1850 to 1898, in the book, turnover rate of 50.2%.
terms and limited the terms and the senate was actually made up of members appointed by the state legislatures. they would be appalled by career politicians and you can read their letters. you can read their writings. they expected the people to go home and retain the farms and stay as farmers and business men and so forth. they didn t believe in a permanent legislative class. as a matter of fact, professor rotunda has written that the house of representatives turns over less than the house of lords. you put that in the book. even in 2010. 85%, which was a wave election. we call it a tidal wave election. 85% still re-electedre-elected. some of them didn t run. we re cheering it. whereas, you know, in the 1800s, you had 50% turnover after 2 years. and 80% turnover after 4 years. from 1850 to 1898, in the book, turnover rate of 50.2%.