alert here in the united states. 747s don t blow up in fireballs seen for 40 miles. the missile theory is not new. back at the time, a journalist said he had evidence that it was friendly fire from the navy gunners. what do you make of that? peter sallinger spent some time in the u.s. senate. over in france, apparently three sheets to the wind, waving a piece of paper say thing is a report from french intelligence that says the uss normandy shot down this plane, which was absolute total bunk. it was the rantings of some nut on the internet and it was debunked. the technology has changed a lot since then. do you think it would make sense for the ntsd, the fbi to bring together a team and at least run the same tests using the new technology to see if they see anything different? i don t see anything wrong with that. the day i had my closing press
he was a great guy. i m in vegas, and the last time i saw mr. gandolfini was in vegas. we were at a dinner together honoring muhammad ali. we were at the same table. he was a great fan of muhammad ali. as i told erin burnett, a man next to a table had bid on a cruise of like $250,000 and invited james to go with him, and he said, of course i ll go. he was exuberant, lively, very, very sad to hear. i had my heart attack when i was 53, so i ve outlived that for a long time. he did, sanjay, he loved his food, and he was not he didn t push back from the table. larry, when he went from being a very good, don t get me wrong character actor to a superstar as tony sparano, what
thousand agents on this investigation. we took the missile theory, the possibility of missile brought down the plane very, very seriously. you know, at that time in 96, we were at a very high state of alert here in the united states. 747s don t blow up in fireballs seen for 40 miles. the missile theory is not new. back at the time, a journalist said he had evidence that it was friendly fire from the navy gunners. what do you make of that? peter sallinger spent some time in the u.s. senate. over in france, apparently three sheets to the wind, waving a piece of paper saying this is a report from french intelligence that says the uss normandy shot down this plane, which was absolute total bunk. it was the rantings of some nut on the internet and it was debunked. the technology has changed a lot since then. do you think it would make sense for the ntsd, the fbi to bring together a team and at least run
agents in the hangar up to what he thinks is hanky panky. if my people were there 24/7, if they thought hanky panky was going on i would have knowledge of that and if it took place it had good reason. we had a whole team of lab tech nixes that looked at evidence around the clock. at the peak, john, i had 1,000 agents on this investigation. we took the missile theory, the possibility of a missile brought down the plane very seriously. at that time, in 1 96 we were in a high state of alert here in the united states. 747s don t blow up in fire balls for 40 miles. the missile theory is not new. at the time that peter salinger came forward he said he had evidence that there was friendly fire from the navy. what do you make of that. peter salinger is a guy who
when we exhausted the investigation i had a thousand agents assigned to it. we took seriously the idea that a missile could have shot down the plane. 747s don t blow up in fireballs that can be seen 40 miles away. we are at a very high state of alert in the united states. so the chances were we didn t know for sure. we had no idea. it could have been terrorism. could have been the intervention of some maniac at the airport either by bringing aboard a bomb on the plane in the luggage or in the storage areas or some mechanic putting something somewhere or a missile shot at the plane. we used all the assets of the united states. all the missile experts in the military. we shot missiles at planes so we could study what kind of damage they did to the aluminum frames. fbi agents are great at looking