work on 3/17, it couldn t be you. judge jeanine: they proved that she was at work working on the computer when the search for chloroform was made. they proved it on that date. she didn t say it was that date. in the dwien 2009 deposition so identifyd that she did that search then and the state attorney went and asked her how do you spell chlorophyll. i still don t have the information as to where did you get that question from. my client didn t bring that up. it was the state that brought it up. is came from some where. judge jeanine: here is the bottom line. it was clear to me that she was taking the hit for her daughter but obviously that was her choice. several jurors feel that your other client george wasn t truthful and he was combative on the stand. was he? absolutely he was. can you imagine sitting and listening while mr. baez in his opening statement in front of millions of peeples an people 2
is specific to the words neck and breaking. more devastating to the defense, the hard cold computer evidence that cindy was, indeed, at work. as custodian of records at gentiva did you ask for the log-in and logout times of an individual by the name of cindy cynthia marie anthony for the week of march 17 of 2008? yes, i did. it was part of the subpoena request. there is a w with a number and then it ends in an a diswhrarks syndicateing that c.m. anthony logged on to her workstation a desktop at the winter park office and opened a session in unity. and then right below that and that was done on 3/17 at
apparently the prosecution had secured some employment records to show that wasn t true. that testimony never got in. nonetheless, there s the possibility the prosecution may go after her for not being truthful on the stand. do you have any fear that is going to happen? i m always the worst-case scenario type of attorney. i m hopeful the state wouldn t do something like that. my client remains strong in her position she did do those searches. i was the state that said 3/17/ 08. my client just confirmed that. she didn t remember the specific date. regardless, there are other records out there that would confirm that my client wasn t necessarily at work all day. and the state does have that. greta: i can t imagine the pain your clients are going through. has there been eye contact some sort of acknowledgement of your clients and casey in
secured some employment records to show that wasn t true. that testimony never got in. nonetheless, there s the possibility the prosecution may go after her for not being truthful on the stand. do you have any fear that is going to happen? i m always the worst-case scenario type of attorney. i m hopeful the state wouldn t do something like that. my client remains strong in her position she did do those searches. i was the state that said 3/17/ 08. my client just confirmed that. she didn t remember the specific date. regardless, there are other records out there that would confirm that my client wasn t necessarily at work all day. and the state does have that. greta: i can t imagine the pain your clients are going through. has there been eye contact some sort of acknowledgement of your clients and casey in
where they are now? they are standing in gridlock. they had a far center right deal on the table and back in march of 2012 they had a committee releasing a deal that was 85% spending cuts and 15% tax increases. the deal on the table at the end was $2.4 trillion in deficit reduction and $2 trillion spending and $400 billion tax increases which would make it a 73/17 deal, and basically a margin of error there, and they said it was a basically default on the national debt, and they pushed so it hard that the democrats could not falter any longer and so now both sides are waiting for the outside forces, the market or the public to break the logjam. we know the forces with wall street s reaction and the best and the brightest who are watching the issue and watching the rhetoric and chimed in on