back to the watergate. right? in the 70s on nixon. it is astonishing. it is not even that there is a some joint understanding of what the facts are as you were saying before. they re just keep on going with the things that got them in trouble in the first place. that s the democrats argument that they need to do this now. they can t wait for the courts to rule on bringing more witnesses or getting the white house to comply with subpoenas because the president cheated or tried to cheat and he will continue to try to cheat, a threat to our elections. republicans, though, are saying this is all nonsense. they re arguing something completely different, as if the two sides are not just two sides but in two different universes. that s exactly right and sitting on the sidelines what s so fascinating about this to nick s point is barbara mcquaid called it the crime that keeps criming and that s a good way to put it but i want to go back to the point you don t need a crime