and this was made locally, which one do you choose? wouldn t it be nice if you could maybe scan the products to see what is good and what is bad? here in the netherlands, one company is trying to make the environmental impact of products more transparent. the idea is that you scan the qr code attached to the product and you get a score out of 100. this shirt here is 66/100, 0k. this shirt over here, which does look pretty much the same, 70/100. 0k, slightly better, i ll have that one. dayrize s co founder austin sims explains that this one score actually consists of five subscores, assessing things like carbon emissions, materials and recyclability, and also the impact on the people creating it. 68/100 for your lavender and ylang wax melts. how necessary a product actually is also gets a score. what is an example of a product that has no purpose?
wouldn t it be nice if you could maybe scan the products to see what s good and what s bad? here in the netherlands, one company is trying to make the environmental impact of products more transparent. the idea is that you scan the qr code attached to the product and you get a score out of 100. this shirt here, 66/100, 0k. this shirt over here, which does look pretty much the same, 70/100. 0k, slightly better, i ll have that one. dayrize s co founder, austin sims, explains that this one score actually consists of five subscores, assessing things like carbon emissions, materials and recyclability, and also the impact on the people creating it. 68/100 for your lavender and ylang wax melts. how necessary a product actually is also gets a score. what is an example of a product
68/100 for your lavender and ylang wax melts. how necessary a product actually is also gets a score. what is an example of a product that has no purpose? a product that scores low on purpose would be like an electric pepper grinder. 500 fashion, home and beauty brands have already been signed up, and this system actually lends itself to online shopping, where scores can be easily displayed next to the products. the idea is that anything and everything could eventually have this standardised label. now, there is already an industry standard for working out environmental impacts it s called a life cycle assessment. but this requires brands to dig deep into their data a lengthy, expensive process that few companies bother to do. no brand has all the information that we need to actually understand
explains that this one score actually consists of five subscores, assessing things like carbon emissions, materials and recyclability, and also the impact on the people creating it. 68/100 for your lavender and ylang wax melts. how necessary a product actually is also gets a score. what is an example of a product that has no purpose? a product that scores low on purpose would be like an electric pepper grinder. 500 fashion, home and beauty brands have already been signed up, and this system actually lends itself to online shopping, where scores can be easily displayed next to the products. the idea is that anything and everything could eventually have this standardised label. now, there is already an industry standard for working out environmental impacts it s called a life cycle assessment.