they can use their state to call people to jihad. not just to syria, not just to iraq but here in the united states around the world, and call people to take arms against the united states. you ve seen their plans. they re talking about acquiring a nuclear weapon from pakistan. they re talking about bringing it into the united states. we can blow that off. but these are people who are crucifying people burning people. these are folks who don t seem to be at all constrained by any norms of conduct that any other state would have. we d better take them seriously. let me ask you about immigration because the obama administration suffered a defeat this week when their attempt to basically get the president s executive order going forward was denied by the 5th circuit court of appeals. if you do win this nomination and if you win the presidency what would a president santorum do to reverse that executive order if it takes effect again and deal with the 11 to 12 million illegal immigrants
developing now, immigration activists are holding a nationwide day of action today, a day that marks what would have been the start of president obama s executive action offering deportation relief for millions of undocumented immigrant immigrants. an organizer from the maryland group just tweeted this picture from an event in baltimore with the hash tag # fight for dapa. groups are staging dozens of events across the country, leaving undocumented parents of american-born children in limbo. and right now, 26 states, led by texas, are challenging the president s executive actions in federal court and in a new filing yesterday the obama administration asked the federal 5th circuit court of appeals to set aside the court order blocking those actions. joining me now, msnbcnews.com
sandwich. lunch involved fire, pot, heat. seasoning. forget that you work every day, mom and dad. exactly. that was great. wonder what he would say about tv dinners. no, he would not go for that. in the big talker this morning, department of justice responds to the 5th circuit court of appeals after requesting a clarification of how the administration views the health care law. and holder said the power of the court to review the constitutional of legislation is beyond dispute. does it change what happened in that is what bill and megyn were talking about whether the supreme court will hold the president s comments about hip. they disagree. these gives, they read the pains, they watch the factor,
across the country how this administration has shown determined disregard for the law. and that is a phrase that came from one of the judges that the 5th circuit court of appeals upheld when they were having to deal with the obama administration flaunting the law on the drilling moratorium. they know how it operates and they are making them pay a price and it s a good thing. this is unprecedented because it is in the middle, you know, the court hasn t even decided here. and he can make his opinions known. he s free to do so. but it s at the time when this decision is not final. it seems to me to be intimidation. this is not first time the president did this. if you remember at the state of the union address you could see justice skalia say not true. last week the supreme court reverse add century of law that i believe will open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in our election.
court is comprise evidence a group of unelected gusties. he must spell out what the president meant and if the justice versus the right to overturn obamacare. joining me is the author of the new york city best teller michelle malcolm. have you ever heard of march barry madison, chief justice john marshall, quote, a law repugnant to the constitution is void, unquote. well, now we have the 5th circuit assigning homework not only to obama but all of his lawyer minions at the department. it is a humiliating spanking for the obama administration and it s about time. it s also not a coincidence this order is coming from the 5th circuit court of appeals. because this judiciary knows probably more than any other