feel very unfair. but on top of this, people, i think this is the reason why the opposition to this reform is not coming down but on the contrary, it is increasing, it is the way the government did it. there we come to the constitutional issue because the reason why the government chose this procedure is because it allows you to restrict debate in the parliament and to users article that is famous outside of france, 49.3. it gives you the right to posit even though you don t have a majority. that is also a reason why now, it is notjust about the pension reform, but the state of our democracy. just the pension reform, but the state of our democracy- our democracy. just a final question. our democracy. just a final question, because - our democracy. just a final i question, because president our democracy. just a final - question, because president macron says france can t afford not to make this change. it would come in 2030, so that is the case he makes around the economics. in term
whole, whether the law is deemed constitutional or unconstitutional, and the damage done has been the 11th time since the government used this article of constitution, 49.3, which bypasses parliament and the vote of parliament, so it has affected our institutions and the way we look at the danger of giving too much power to an executive. it’s too much power to an executive. it s interesting because there s so much anger the streets in france, we ve seen that over two and a half months, but the change in pension age when the list of when the rest of the world looks at this looks rather modest, 62 to 64, and it s much later in other countries. why do you think it seems to have sparked such anger and protest? is
in the end doesn t that mean it s over? the reform has happened, pension age has risen by two years and therefore the protests will not achieve anything. i and therefore the protests will not achieve anything. and therefore the protests will not achieve anything. i understand what ou mean, achieve anything. i understand what you mean. the achieve anything. i understand what you mean, the law achieve anything. i understand what you mean, the law is achieve anything. i understand what you mean, the law is under- achieve anything. i understand what you mean, the law is under scrutiny| you mean, the law is under scrutiny of the you mean, the law is under scrutiny of the constitutional council, it is still not of the constitutional council, it is still not over. it might overthrow some still not over. it might overthrow some or still not over. it might overthrow some or the complete law, the fight is not some or the complete law, the fight is not over some or the complete la
force using the constitutional device, article 49.3 of the constitution. this has fuelled the anger of the workers even more widely of the citizens. widely of the citizens. 49.3 has been used widely of the citizens. 49.3 has been used dozens widely of the citizens. 49.3 has been used dozens of widely of the citizens. 49.3 has been used dozens of times, - widely of the citizens. 49.3 has been used dozens of times, it i widely of the citizens. 49.3 has i been used dozens of times, it has been used dozens of times, it has been authorised by the constitutional council, why would they throw it out on this occasion? because the law of the pension is housed in a financial law, it could not be a good vehicle for such a reform, moreover, there was no blockage, i don t know how you say in english, it was not blocked in the national assembly. the government didn t have the majority, the vote could have happened. 96%
this has fuelled the anger of the workers and the citizens. 49.3 has been used workers and the citizens. 49.3 has been used dozens workers and the citizens. 49.3 has been used dozens of workers and the citizens. 49.3 has been used dozens of times, i workers and the citizens. 49.3 has been used dozens of times, and l workers and the citizens. 49.3 has been used dozens of times, and it| been used dozens of times, and it has been authorised by the constitutional council, why would they throw it out now? the constitutional council, why would they throw it out now? they throw it out now? the law is housed in they throw it out now? the law is housed in a they throw it out now? the law is housed in a financial they throw it out now? the law is housed in a financial law, - they throw it out now? the law is housed in a financial law, it i they throw it out now? the law isj housed in a financial law, it could not be housed in a financial law, it could not be a housed in a financia