what are your plans for future eight now you have new congress coming in. since the gop has been more skeptical, is that part of the motivation as to where it s coming. i think it s implicit everything that s happening. it s giving a primetime address tomorrow. it s not totally locked. and you mentioned the security concerns up on capitol hill. he made that trip at the same moment the lawmakers were voting to additional 45 billion dollars in ukraine. if you look through the scale of the course of the last year, you get a sense of how substantial it is starting with 13 point $6 million. 40 billion dollar packages. well this package of 45 billion dollars. 14 and break out with this current package actually represents, we get an understanding of the scope of things. it s not just military assistance. this package is defense assistance. but also 12 billion dollars for
finance that is so important for countries like pakistan. which, admits, less than 1% of the world planted warming gases, but is now faced with a 40 billion dollar bill. but sanderson, cnn, back with more international stories, next, our but for now let s head back to erica hill in new york, with much more of the covered john, appreciate, it well, it is election day here in the, u.s. and as americans get ready to go to the polls there are growing concerns about misinformation spreading online, just ahead. we ll show you how to separate facts from conspiracy theories, next. i was trying to refinanance my mortgage. i went to check my credit score and i found a couple of inquiries that i had not initiated. within a few weeks of working with crediepair.com, my credit score went up abo 60 points.
speech absolutist, that started to erode over the last couple of days. we have seen bad sides today about who s been let back on. i wonder what he wants to do exactly, how fully he is embracing this role is chief, or the person who owns this 440 billion dollar product. but also what it means for discourse in this country, what is going back to what we were talking about before. i ve been thinking a lot about what you wrote about in your last book, and the role of these very wealthy individuals in our society, being successful, having a lot of money, and feeling imbued to making decisions about how our society should act and how we should communicate and deal with one another. and just how much money they give to lawmakers, they are controlling so much of our government. what do we do about this? and even as people are panicked about twitter, what does the congressman for all these years. as these platforms have become congress where utilities, congress has done nothing. now we are al
we talked about him being a free speech absolutist, that started to erode over the last couple of days. we have seen bad signs today about who s been let back on. i wonder what he wants to do exactly, how fully he is embracing this role is chief, or the person who owns this 440 billion dollar product. but also what it means for discourse in this country, what is going back to what we were talking about before. i ve been thinking a lot about what you wrote about in your last book, and the role of these very wealthy individuals in our society, being successful, having a lot of money, and feeling imbued to make decisions about how our society should act and how we should communicate and deal with one another. and just how much money they give to lawmakers, they are controlling so much of our government. what do we do about this? and even as people are panicked about twitter, what does the congressman for all these years. as these platforms have become congress where utilities, congress
approved version. that was for all the college kids on social media.l life but in real life, she didn te dn mean a wor td of it. the only part she meant was america is terrible. she does believe that wat she ds hate the country. but pulling back fro m a war why that will hurt the country, why? would she do that? she doesn t like the country anything. it ssh not in our interest. cout she s completely for.ry and that s why this year, sandy cortez, along with every member of the squad, the progressives s ,voted to approve another t massive 40 billion dollar military spendinproveg. bush even voted for it even after she admitted it would directly contribute to, quote, the increased risks of directt war and the potential for direct military confrontation and een russia and the us . so even corey bush, probably the lowest iq member of the united states th, congress, it was pretty obvious where this was going. it was going toweso wat iqr wita ,but she voted for it anyway. they all did. mea