[cheers and applause]. it s true. no, it s true. so, china in their record year of course they will catch it, he was $2 off. he gets a pinnochio. but adam schiff got 4 pinocchios. their biggest year was 16 billion dollars. that was a lot of corn. they are going to buy not 16, not 20, not 30. not 40. they are going to buy between 40 and $50 billion worth of agricultural corn. [cheers and applause]. my people said to me, sir, they can t do it. they can t produce that much. i said you know what? it s true. my people wanted to stop at 20. i am not stopping at 20.
little, shall we say premature. kristin: premature. he s a busy man. can nt do everything, right? well, china and the u.s. will attempt a breakthrough in the escalating trade war before a new round of tariffs take effect next week. that round 16 billion dollars, that will go into effect on thursday as china levies them against the u.s. matthew, let me get this, we ve got 16 billion worth of more tariffs going into effect on thursday and hearings this week for potential of $200 billion more tariffs. i mean, what does this all mean if they all go into effect or u.s. consumers? well, first off, let s be very clear, there s nothing positive for u.s. consumers or really americans for being in a trade war. so, that s very important. but the fact is, that we have a president who is using tools in his toolbox that i think previous presidents have not used before. and so, right now, the stage
employment is the ideal because recently we have had this picture where we were falling our dreams with jay carney s line was preferable to being required to sustain a job that sucks i think was the bottom line. we are not even in a universe where employment is viewed as both parties version of the ideal. we are at a place now where raising the minimum wage, should it result in a loss of 500,000 jobs is debatable, whether that is good or bad is not surprising to me because we are debating whether having a job that may not be ideal is what everyone wants. on the flip side it puts 900,000 people above the poverty line who weren t there. if 500 thousand lose their jobs, is that better? i don t know. i think mike really put it in perspective when you follow that on the 16 billion dollars paid for a company with 300 employees, whatever it is, that does something 55 employees. it is 55. minimum wage should be
about cutting saturday delivery. now it will expand to an extra day. package shipments which are more profitable are increasing. and the postal service wants to form similar agreements with other retailers. the postal service is getting created after losing almost 16 billion dollars in just the fiscal year of 2012. and i just wanted would you have to pay extra for sunday delivery? good question. no. there s no extra charge. if you signed up for amazon for the annual fee, you can pay orders on a friday to get them on a sunday. and if it you order something on amazon, you re not going to be able to specify a sunday delivery. as it begins to roll out, it s only going to be available in
from private investors, created at its peak 600 jobs. megyn: wow. it was a disaster. it was an farce. i won t say it s a scam because i m sure they intend itted well. megyn: they tried. they tried. megyn: but the market has not been there for a lot of the green energy. the administration says win some, lose some. the green energy portfolio. we re on the winning side and we re not going to hit pay dirt on every one. that s funny. it s like this administration saying it s open and transparent. i ve looked at the winners and the losers, i can t find the winners, i cannot find the winners at all. and it s you know, if anyone, the energy would like to clear it up for me, it would be helpful if you could tell me where any spectacular success has arisen as a result of the investment by the doe. because what i see is an absolute waste of 16 billion dollars under this program. megyn: their big car was