Chris Cuomo asks the tough questions to newsmakers in Washington and around the world. Chris Cuomo asks the tough questions to newsmakers in Washington and around the world. People . Im very concerned, chris. I worked hard in a bipartisan way to get 380 million in Election Grants out and distributed to states. Thats something senator klobuchar, senator lankford and others really fought for. And im trying this week in the election excuse me in the upcoming appropriations votes were having in the senate to get another round of 250 million in grants to states so that they can strengthen their Cybersecurity Defenses so they can procure new Voting Systems and equipment. Senator klobuchar was just on in the previous segment with anderson cooper. Yep. She and senator lankford have a great bill, the secure elections act, that i think we should take up and pass that is a corollary or a complementary
referring to, chris, who testified today, clearly a career professional, was someone who had giv
Other from controversial issues, from immigration issues, and theyre doing it again. Thats why we have to pass this bill so that you have clear information about whos paying for these ads and what they are. Its called the honest ads act, and its a bill im leading with senator mccain and senator warner. Senator, appreciate your time. Thank you very much. The news continues. I want to hand it over to chris. Cuomo prime time starts now. Thank you, anderson. I am chris cuomo. Welcome to prime time. Collusion is not a crime except when it is. And remember this isnt about words. Its about behavior. We have a lawmaker who is going to tell you the facts of what could be headed for anyone who did collude. He was also in that hearing today, and you will not believe what the government admitted about its plan to force families apart. Theres senator coons. Well be with him in a second. The Mueller Probe faces its first courtroom test today with
trumps former Campaign Chair on trial. Were going to
by the first amendment? and the answer is clear. we don t know. we don t know. we ve never had a case like this go to the supreme court. the earlier case called the progressive case, where they wanted to print instructions for how to make a hydrogen bomb, ended up being moot, and being moot for the reason that will probably make this case moot. by the time the case came to the court, the instructions were all over the place. anybody could easily find how to make a hydrogen bomb. how about the argument that they haven t seen it used in a crime? well, you know, that s not a good enough argument. look, the answer is that the court may very well say the instructions, the blueprints, are protected by the first amendment. but you should disable any machine from making this kind of weapon, not only prohibit the weapon, which we ve already done, but also prohibit any 3-d machine from being capable of making the weapon. that would raise a second amendment question. yeah. but second amen
machine from being capable of making the weapon. that would raise a second amendment question. yeah. but second amendment issues are easier than first amendment issues. so in the end, i think the blueprints will be allowed to be shown, and that s a moot issue because they ve already been shown. and anybody who wants to have access to this is going to be able to get it one way or another. and you have all the terrorist handbook stuff that s out there that falls into the same kind of categories. they re already out there. i don t want to compromise the first amendment. chris, can i add one thing here? yeah. you know, right now federal law protects gun manufacturers from tort liability, from being sued by people who get shot by the weapons they make. that s right. terrible law. these people are putting these instructions on, there are now reasonably foreseeable consequences to what they re doing. i think if any of these guns end up being used in a crime, they can expect
realistic looking plane, which we see before that, flying through the air in 3d. and then making it land on the real airport. after the plane lands, it comes to a stop and the pilot pops out of the cockpit. that s where a real plane comes into play. we used the real plane, because we had to have all those dimensions. we have to have the position for the pilot where he comes out. so what happened was, we shooted it with the real plane. and afterwards, we put the 3-d machine right on to the real one. this picture, we can see the layers. the person actually opens the window and steps out. and that was what we thought would be necessary for the people to make it real for them. but after weeks of work, the team couldn t quite manage to make the landing look real enough. it looked a bit like, i don t know, a toy plane landing. when we saw we first thought, okay, we have to work on it. it has to be super realistic.