Like they do. they say you can t understand what it is like to be in our shoes. when janet napolitano was governor there she wanted the united states government to reimburse her 350 million dollars because they were holding illegals in jail in one year. that was her. sean: she said it is an unfair question to ask if the border is secure. she wanted the border secure when she was there i don t know why she is flip-flopping this is a federal problem. of course. [ talking over each other ] hired one of his generals from the d day invasion i m putting you in charge tell the employers, don t hire any illegal aliens we ll put your name in the paper on the front page and put you in jail and expand the guest worker program. you will have a pass to hire temporary guest workers. some stayed, most didn t. some stayed and became fine citizens. we solved this problem in the 50s.
Million americans out of work are going to get jobs because illegal aliens aren t here. a lot or a little illegal immigrants here? a lot. that s not the problem. the problem is we don t have jobs. the construction industry is in the toilet and a lot of industries are in the toilet and that s the issue, the economy is not growing. tara, what do you say? this bill is already having negative impacts on the economy. boycotts are going on, canceled, when there were similar boycotts in 1993 over the martin luther king day refusal of arizona to recognize dr. martin luther king s birthday. 130 conventions were lost by the state of arizona. 350 million dollars was lost by the state of arizona. the super bowl was canceled. this is already negatively impacting arizona s economy and who wants to go with major protests going on. we re talking jobs. there are 13 million people
Dollars out of medicare and shifted it to obama care. we had seniors on that vote. every age span, every gender, every economic sector with us on this issue. i know we could have won this fight. greta: friday night when we were doing the show. the vote went down during our two hour show. many republicans were taking a victory lap because it was 38 billion dollars and a spending cut. last night reread a nonpartisan scores it is suddenly 350 million dollars, profoundly less. is there a reaction in echoing in the republican side of the house of representatives that the deal was a bad deal and they never should have agreed or are republicans satisfied with it? some are, some aren t. there is an echoing that was a story in the national journal. the numbers were from the congressional budget office that said we went from 38.5 billion to 352 million.