if we had kept the cost sharing reductions, this is the increase you d see for 2018. without them, pennsylvania was 9% now it s 20%. michigan, 17%, now 27%. georgia was going to be up 31.5%. now up 54%. maryland was going to be up 33%. they have not speculated what it will be without the csrs. so we don t know what s going to happen there until now. other states almost assumed because the president had hinted that the csrs would not continue. delaware looking at a 25% increase. south carolina, 31%, tennessee 37%. iowa 37%. the big exception is alaska which has the highest health insurance premiums in the nation. they announced an average premium decrease of 26.5% even though they assumed the is csrs would not continue. already the attorneys general of new york and california say they are going to file lawsuits to prevent president trump from
collected on a retroactive basis going back 90 days, but a testify 90 days ago that the canadians were put on notice about this being an inappropriate process. what it amounts to is the following. there is roughly $15 billion worth of hard soft wood lumber used in houses in this country. about 31.5% of that comes from the canadians. so that s roughly $5 billion a year. 20% tariff on that is essentially $1 billion a year. and the retro speck teufrb 90 day feature adds another $250 million to that on the one time basis. soft wood lender is the fundamentally used in single
given year. part of the reason i don t see that there will be a huge price differential coming in is this only affects 31.5% of that output. the competition among the american producers remains the same. so this is not like suddenly house prices are going to go up 10% or 15%. that s silly. how many jobs pardon me? how many new jobs will be created or jobs will be saved as a result of stopping the i don t have an exact total. but i can tell you, it is in quite a few states along the northern perimeter, going all the way down into louisiana. so this affects quite a number of people and quite a number of businesses. do you expect bipartisan support at the very least on the actions of soft wood lumber,
collected on a retroactive basis going back 90 days because it was 90 days ago that the canadians were put on notice about this being an inappropriate process. what it amounts to is the following. there is roughly $15 billion worth of softwood lumber used in houses in this country and about 31.5% of that comes from the canadians. so that s roughly $25 billion a year. a tariff on that is a billion dollars a year and the 90-day feature adds 250,000 to that on a one-time basis. softwood lumber, as i say, is the fundamental they use in
now, i want to show you the amount that s actually been knocked off the company s shared price since that particular date. take a look at this. it s a staggering 83.22%. that s equivalent to 25.5 yen or 31.5 cents every single day since march 11th. it certainly is an extraordinarily large number. 83%. let s show you how quickly and dramatically that stock collapse actually took place. now, what you see here is in the month before the disaster, the triple disaster, the tsunami, the earthquake, and the disaster, tepco s share price was hovering fairly steadily. around 2,100 yen. that s around about $26 per share. now, here is march 11. the share price that day was 2,121 yen. within six days, though, it had dropped by 62% from here down to here. 62.5%. a little bit of bargain hunting