not pass it on. there is a different thing again. actually quite an important distinction.- thing again. actually quite an important distinction. when you have a dress that as important distinction. when you have a dress that as well. important distinction. when you have a dress that as well. in important distinction. when you have a dress that as well. in your- a dress that as well. in your statement. and you have addressed that. statement. and you have addressed that and statement. and you have addressed that. and there was a stock take meeting. that. and there was a stock take meeting, the meeting to which she referred meeting, the meeting to which she referred earlier, that is,, i think, 146558, referred earlier, that is,, i think, 146558, a referred earlier, that is,, i think, 146558, a letter from imran shafi, who reported on the meeting, a meeting who reported on the meeting, a meeting between yourself and the prime meeting between yourself
border because in terms of the merits of border measures, evidence has been received border measures, evidence has been received by border measures, evidence has been received by the inquiry to the fact that less received by the inquiry to the fact that less stringent measures like screening that less stringent measures like screening and leaflets and temperature checks are unlikely to work because they can be circumnavigated. practical difficulties with any border system of restriction. scientifically, there of restriction. scientifically, there was no support for complete trorder there was no support for complete border closure or quarantine because they are border closure or quarantine because they are very difficult to maintain and politically divisive and also unlikely and politically divisive and also unlikely to work? and politically divisive and also unlikely to work? yes, in a sense the technical unlikely to work? yes, in a sense the technicaljudgmen