hence? not had become adequate two days hence? ., . . , not had become adequate two days hence? ., ., ., , ,., not had become adequate two days hence? ., ., ., , ., hence? you have answered your own cuestion. hence? you have answered your own question. compliance hence? you have answered your own question. compliance was hence? you have answered your own question. compliance was not - hence? you have answered your own question. compliance was not going | question. compliance was not going up question. compliance was not going up fast enough and that more evidence was accumulating about the spread of the virus. you evidence was accumulating about the spread of the virus. spread of the virus. you knew already it spread of the virus. you knew already it was spread of the virus. you knew already it was an spread of the virus. you knew already it was an exponential| already it was an exponential spread already it was an exponential spread. you didn t know any more a
and develop and therefore avoid the need for a mandatory lockdown? its almost a mirror image of the conversation we were having earlier, coming into the weekend of the 13th of march, the government had not reacted quickly enough because the disease was further advanced than the government believed and we believe. there was no appetite to take it any further. of course, in theory it would have been possible to deliver the stay at home message is an advisory rather than mandatory message but there was some evidence emerging, again some other anecdotal, that having advised people to stay away from crowded indoor spaces like pubs and so on that they wouldn t. i don t know whether it was a focus group, i seem to remember one of the number ten team saying is what we re hearing that if you meant us to stay away from the pubs you would close the pubs. so it seemed necessary to impose mandatory lockdown given how quickly the disease was moving in order to minimise that risk. lard orde