now on bbc news, our world. across america, police are increasingly using facial recognition technology to fight crime. . , ., recognition technology to fight crime. . i” .,, recognition technology to fight crime. . crime. can you open the door! we want crime. can you open the door! we want law crime. can you open the door! we want law enforcement - crime. can you open the door! we want law enforcement to l crime. can you open the door! - we want law enforcement to have more we want law enforcement to have more tools we want law enforcement to have more tools at our disposal, not less more tools at our disposal, not less. . , . . more tools at our disposal, not less. . , , ., ., less. images can be fed into a database less. images can be fed into a database to less. images can be fed into a database to sevastova - less. images can be fed into a l database to sevastova matches track people down. but critics argue the use of this technology could be inaccurate. i
an asteroid, estimated to be between a0 and 90 metres wide passed harmlessly between the orbits of the earth and the moon this evening in what astronomers are calling a once in a decade event. at ten o clock we will be here with a full round up of the days news. first, ourworld: facial recognition fighting crime? across america, police are increasingly using facial recognition technology to fight crime. speaks spanish. can you open the door? we want law enforcement to have more tools at our disposal, not less. images can be fed into a database to search for matches and track people down. but critics argue the use of this technology is opaque and could be inaccurate. if law enforcement knows how accurate that is, how come they are fighting so hard to keep that information from us when we ask for it? why won t they share it? i m james clayton, and i m investigating whether the police should be using this controversial tech. the technology itself is harmful. it is too danger
how accurate that is, how come they are fighting so hard to keep that information from us when we ask for it? why won t they share it? i m james clayton, and i m investigating whether the police should be using this controversial tech. the technology itself is harmful. it is too dangerous and that is just a massive threat to civil liberties in this nation. march, 2017. andrew conlyn is driving with a friend. i think we made about 1.5 miles into a 30 mile trip. andrew is in the front passenger seat, his friend is driving. and he s probably hitting 80, 90. i m saying, you know,
if law enforcement knows how accurate that is, how come they are fighting so hard to keep that information from us when we ask for it? why won t they share it? i m james clayton, and i m investigating whether the police should be using this controversial tech. the technology itself is harmful. it is too dangerous and that is just a massive threat to civil liberties in this nation. march, 2017. andrew conlyn is driving with a friend. i think we made about 1.5 miles into a 30 mile trip. andrew is in the front passenger seat, his friend is driving. and he s probably hitting 80, 90.
it is too dangerous and that is just a massive threat to civil liberties in this nation. march, 2017. andrew conlyn is driving with a friend. i think we made about 1.5 miles into a 30 mile trip. andrew is in the front passenger seat, his friend is driving. and he s probably hitting 80, 90. i m saying, you know, slow down . it was falling on deaf ears i don t think he responded at all so i basically reached the conclusion that somebody was going to die that night.