workers were also objecting to the chemical poisoning of schoolgirls in the lead up right before the end of the iranian new year in early march. i mean, the new year is 20 march. so i think that because none of the demands of the iranian public have been responded to, the government has not taken any steps to respond to the many points of dissent and dissatisfaction that iranians have, i think that iranians have, i think that process are likely to happen again. it is not only going to be about women s rights, because i think this is a point of serious discontent among iranians, and this push back against women, especially schoolgirls, could result in mass protests again. but i think it s the economy, it s the political freedoms, think it s the economy, it s the politicalfreedoms, it s the politicalfreedoms, it s the lack of accountability on the lack of accountability on the part of government, its corruption. so i think that we re definitely going to see more protests in the months to
earlier last year. could we see more protests potentially coming about now? i definitely think so. we also saw massive protests of teachers union workers, who were also objecting to the chemical poisoning of schoolgirls in the lead up right before the end of the iranian new year in early march. i mean, the new year is 20 march. so i think that because none of the demands of the iranian public have been responded to, and the government has not taken any steps to respond to the many points of dissent and dissatisfaction that iranians have, i think that protests are likely to happen again. it s not only going to be about women s rights, because i think this is a point of serious discontent among iranians, and this pushback against women, especially schoolgirls, could result in mass protests again. but i think it s the economy, it s the political freedoms, it s the lack of accountability on the part of government, it s corruption. so i think that we re definitely going to see more protests
want to draw their own conclusions about the confidence they can place in her inquiry or the motives behind her and the way she conducted her inquiry, and into her report. i think people. how can i put this in the most restricted.? i think people may look at it in a different light. i m joined now by professor sam power a senior lecturer in politics at the university of sussex, in south east england. sam, thank you very much forjoining us. what were your initial thoughts into these findings by the privileges committee that he misled parliament on four occasions? so it s parliament on four occasions? sr it s certainly awkward for boris johnson and an old make for really interesting hearings which we know will happen later on the week beginning 20 march. what the inquiry have initially said it is they think that there are these four moments,
particularly that they re looking at, where borisjohnson may have misled parliament. so this suggests that what boris johnson has misled parliament. so this suggests that what borisjohnson has to do is sort of make it up a little bit. he ll start these hearings on the back foot because there is these four specific episodes one in response to secure starmer himself in pmqs, another in response to another labour party mp asking whether he was aware of these parties that they expect he may have misled parliament and they want some clarity on that. borisjohnson on the other hand is quite punchy in his defence. he certainly starts off on the back foot and he s got work to do, but we will have to wait until 20 march or thereabouts when the oral evidence happens to see quite how this really does shake out. 50 quite how this really does shake out, ., ., quite how this really does shake out. ., ., , quite how this really does shake out, ., ., y” “ quite how this really does shake out.
this is bbc world news. the latest headlines after his historic visit to kyiv, president biden arrives in warsaw, to meet with european leaders. two weeks after being struck by catastrophic earthquakes, turkey is hit by a further deadly tremor. twitter is removing text message two factor authentication for non subscribers. in a tweet on saturday, the twitter support account confirmed only twitter blue subscribers would be able to use text message authentication from 20 march. this means that, unless you pay the subscription fee, you won t have that extra layer of security. it s part of a trend where internet companies are looking for