to not represent the popular vote. i had forgotten about that piece completely until today. i m reading and this thinking huh, that sounds like a radical theory in some circles, certainly. but nobody was thinking that would be part of a criminal conspiracy if anyone even thought to implement that that was interesting. yeah. it s completely hypocritical. of course, they would say that president trump went further on january 6th. but, there s no question that it s hypocritical. and this is more of the same. can you think of anything more anti-democratic than the idea that some state functionary, some state secretary of state can declare on his or her own i think donald trump has engaged in insurrection or rebill yoel i don t know as understood in the 1st amendment without any kind of a trial, without any kind of process, without any kind of definition. it s just ludicrous.
look at the polling today. the real clear politics average has him at 53%. closest one to him is desantis. right now he is at 13%. that s the national polling. democrats and never trumpers know he is the inevitable nominee so they are getting contingency plans in place. next up on their list? the 1st amendment. section 3 of the 14th amendment presents a clear and unequivocal statement that anyone who is sworn an oath of office, who engage in insurrection or rebellion, never serve again. donald trump is disqualified just as if he were running and not a born u.s. citizen. laura: never forget that donald trump humiliated the d.c. establishment when he won in 2016. he humiliated them again when the economy boomed from 2017 to right up to the end of 2019 before the pandemic. and then he scared them in 2020 when he came so close to winning despite a year of shut downs and, of course was the violence
to not represent the popular vote. i had forgotten about that piece completely until today. i m reading and this thinking huh, that sounds like a radical theory in some circles, certainly. but nobody was thinking that would be part of a criminal conspiracy if anyone even thought to implement that that was interesting. yeah. it s completely hypocritical. of course, they would say that president trump went further on january 6th. but, there s no question that it s hypocritical. and this is more of the same. can you think of anything more anti-democratic than the idea that some state functionary, some state secretary of state can declare on his or her own i think donald trump has engaged in insurrection or rebill yoel i don t know as understood in the 1st amendment without any kind of a trial, without any kind of process, without any kind of definition. it s just ludicrous.