law that reinstates roe v. wade. all right. he didn t fall off the bike so that s progress. then pete buttigieg defended the protests on fox news sunday because after all, people harass him all the time. i can t even tell you the number of spaces, venues, and scenarios where i have been protested, in the bottom line is this, any public figure should always, always be free from violence, intimidation, and harassment, but should never be free from criticism or people exercising their 1st amendment rights. wow. now, alicia, i m going to go to you first because there was some guy on the panel who would not shut up last break and we ran a lot of clock. i m not going to name names. his name rhymes with broey. i m kidding. good to see you. i m guilty right with you. you are not getting this jacket back. [laughter] easter is not for another year. i have time to find a replacement. let me ask you this, alicia, are the democrats emphasizing this blame and shame, this public
thanks so much. good to see you. thank you. when we come back, desantis versus disney. is the florida governor punipunish ing disney for speaking out about the so-called don t say gay bill and violating 1st amendment rights? meet a future mom, a first-time mom and a seasoned pro. this mom s one step closer to their new mini-van! yeah, you ll get used to it. this mom s depositing money th tools on-hand. cha ching. and this mom, well, she s setting an appointment here, so her son can get set up there and start his own financial journey. that s because these moms all have chase. smart bankers. convenient tools. one bank with the power of both. chase. make more of what s yours.
a law dubbed as the don t say gay bill. back with us again, constitutional law attorney paige pate. even though i said good-bye to you, i didn t mean it. it was a short good-bye. hello again. didn t want to leave. glad to be with you. well, this is a really important topic, you know, because from the outside looking in, i mean, the state government of florida is punishing disney for taking a stance, verbalizing itself against this new law. so would that ultimately be a violation of their 1st amendment to speak as they wanted? i think so, fred. i mean, we have to start with the proposition that a company, just like a person, has the right to freedom of speech. the 1st amendment protects their ability to make statements about things they believe in, things they are against. they absolutely have that protection. the only question here is was