but that s a 1% ago. that s how long we really see you in the monitor because it s like one hundred lightsig blaric into my okay well looking good.w well we ll pick it up where you left off. all right, i ll try.ra i m laura ingram . this is the ingraham angle t from washington tonight. in moments we re going toen spek to one of donald trump s attorneyson about that ongoing battle over the release of the affidavit. but for now, since august 8th, the day the rate of mara lago,e the angle has been e veryf clear to at least half of the country. this investigation appears to be tainted by politics. now the belief isn t grounded t in some knee dislike of the rank and file fbi. but in recent history, specifically the crusade waged by the deep state the against donald trump froman 2015 onwardt a two tiered systemie of justic. one standard for hunterno and hillary, another for donaldh trump. now fast forward to present day when the feds hunt for donald trump took another turn. us ma
but you know, laura , you started out this piece, i think making the most important point. this is shouldn t be looked at in a vacuum. a longer partul ofdn program. it it s the political weaponization of the justice department. wen say these things lightly. my father was an fbi agent. aha i have great respect.ve the agency traditionally. but here i don t think you can minimize the fact that lisaac monaco is a primaryo figure in the justice department,e i m sure involved in these decisions. s.she s an andrew weissman colleague, came up through a the ranks with him, worked with him, close with themnd. we know what the agenda is forss andrew weissman and so on . i m very, very extraordinarily disappointed in merrick garland because here soraor continues to make these statements like he did in abandoned case that this action reflects the equal application of the law. that s just nonsense. wewe know that it doesn t we knw the examples that it s a distinguished by and it s reprehensible, fra
how it would play out. well, i understand that you chose to do that, t but i m i m wondering, are you notrn concerned because you didn t join any of these motions for,of again, the full release of this affidavit that you re then waiving the possible objections to the way redactions are being done by the justice department later on ? because you we were told today,t nor did you join anyhe of these motions. they re going to redactre a all this stuff and i m not sure what grounds are going to have at this point, having waivedfi your right to file those motions. well, we would maintain that we haven t waived our right and that still is maintains we need to wait and see. oi i can t be certain at this point because we haven t seen the affidavit. we certainly haven t seen the redactions and how it s going to play out. we ll be making that decision as it comes out. we got to see it. we haven t seen it. it has been under seal. soso i don t know. wewe can t say, well,
turn this. c if you re criticizing the political leadership of the fbi, they re trying tobl deflect the blame on like we re criticizingamam the rank and fia fbi agents were not were criticizing chris wray or attorney general merrick garland, deputy attorney general lisa monaco, assistantra attorney general for the criminal division. can police were it s the political leadership of the biden justice departmentersh who have weaponizes politicized. the justice department has nothing to doolnt with the rank and file of the fbi. david , l how concerned are you ? w week i d say that this parts of this affidavit, it looks like limited parts will be released. but don t you know you imagine, guys, that those that releaseel is going to be just one big sharpey like across the page? everything s going toer be redacted. you re going to get very little information in my view. ll all going to look bad for trump. that s all. that s my prediction. i think we ll see the forward, as david written out, po
confirmed in 1988.n and department of navy versus egen. the president alsoo had the absolute sole statutoryhe authority to determine whether these records or personal records thatsona belonged to hir presidential records that go to the bureaucrats. the archives then come back to his library as confirmed by a an obama i appointed judge in 2012 dealing with judicial watch. his lawsuit against clinton regarding the tapes in his sock drawer. er so this is clearly an unlawful that was clearly legal groundsen to challenge this raid. wege also have a biased judge, judge bruce reinhardt, recused on june 22nd in trump s lawsuit civil lawsuit versus hillaryry clinton. . we we have his 2017 facebook post where he has a clear judicial bias against president trump. ialhe s president trump personally. so he violated the u.s. code and can in to carnita way of the judicial candidates he