when this chapter, when this not true or taken out of context in a way that doesn t fully trump administration cap ter of american history is over, there show context aside will be a lot of cleanup today. i was i will start by saying that. wait a second. that being said, we have had advocates are concerned that this administration has done diplomatic relations with much more to roll back protection for lgbtq americans denmark since 1804. we survived world wars. than he has to protect them. we can certainly survive donald i understand you re making i was standing in front of trump. that is true. the relationship between nato the berlin embassy three weeks allies. ago with a pride flag raised. i m talking about the these are controversies that relationship that the united states has with nato allies is don t exist. these are things the left wing powerful. is using to force a wedge it s strong. and it can outlast any one between the lgbtq community and the republican party
in office. congress the obama administration cited the logan act as part of the concern and the need to talk to michael flynn. that is a joke. the logan act has been around for 218 years and nobody prosecuted under it. the big thing nobody is paying attention to why was it a counter intelligence investigation. guidelines for special counsel criminal investigations and establish a crime in order to appoint a special counsel. counter intelligence investigations allowed for open-endedness. you don t have to establish a time from the beginning. it allows for a fishing expedition. logan act was 1804. mary anne has a way of waking me up on a monday. me, too. bill: here is giuliani with chris wallace from fox news sunday . he is a special counsel. does he want to interview the president? good luck. after what they did to flynn, the way they trapped him into
be punished, he can just be excelled from office. but there he sits with all his ill-gotten gains, the emoluments from saudi arabia, russia, every place and he gets to keep it all in the meantime he does a lot of harm to the country. that s not what they had in mind. they specifically said in article one, that because the president cannot be impeached by the senate he has to remain liable afterwards. now, how could that work if the president and vice president as part of a ticket ever since 1804, they ve run together? if they get into office together the president leaves his power or leaves under threat of impeachment or eresigns for some other reason or is actually convicted, all he does on the way out is arrange with pence, look, why don t you get the national nightmare over with and
there s another way the power enters the picture, the way gerald ford pardoned nixon. the framers were absolutely clear that because a president that was convicted by the senate of impeachable offenses cannot be punished, he can just be excelled from office. but there he sits with all his ill-gotten gains, the emoluments from saudi arabia, russia, every place and he gets to keep it all in the meantime he does a lot of harm to the country. that s not what they had in mind. they specifically said in article one, that because the president cannot be impeached by the senate he has to remain liable afterwards. now, how could that work if the president and vice president as part of a ticket ever since 1804, they ve run together? if they get into office together the president leaves his power or leaves under threat of
laura: in a s my ring tone by the way. i always want to avoid it. and this is another man who shares maxine s impeachment fantasy. if the democrats sweep to power, jerry nadler would become chairman of the judiciary committee. sharmning his life fork and knife for kavanaugh. we would have to investigate any credible allegations of perjury and other things that haven t been properly looked into before. if he is on the supreme court, and the senate hasn t investigated, then the house will have to. laura: now, with all that s facing america, all of the potential, do we want a prolonged inquisition of a sitting supreme court justice? the last and only time a house impeached a supreme court justice, 1804. so, ready for kavanaugh s circus part 3? or unless senator spartacus becomes a lion tamer i m going