april 2020 fauci responds saying it is a shiny object that will go away. and then in may of 2020, five she nih awards the $8.9 million grant money that you are a referring to from the nih. connect the dots here. was he paying off people to say the narrative he wanted said? and is he protecting? we do not know for sure but all we know that fact seems to suggest that m very point. they sit comes from a lab, that is where the evidence points but suddenly changes they switch 180 degrees, write the article, dr. fauci then uses the article to go out until the country, to tell the american people frankly the world no, no, no it did not come from a lab. the big take away i have is this is the pattern we seen from the biden administration from the left. this is the template they use but frankly we sought this past week the department of education actually went to the national school board association, asked them to ssend them the letter so they have the pretext to go do what
does he tell the chief of staff? no, he goes in to cover up mode and gets these scientists, who we know from their emails into medications two years ago, gets them to change their position. they change their position, they then write the article, and a few months after that, these same guys who initially said this came from a lab they get $8.9 million. that seems to be with the facts show it. we would like to bring these individuals in. we would like to have an interview, a deposition. if we get back in power, we could definitely do that. that s what it all seems to .2. he should have went straight to the president. a virus that comes from the lab doing data function research, he should have went straight to the president. we know he didn t do that. you had mick mulvaney on a couple days ago.
i.e. it was genetically modified not that natural origin. then he h goes out and calls the lab leak hypothesis something out of a comic book. later he gets an $8.9 million grant from fauci s organization. could be a coincidence but i don t think so. maria: hold that thought, back in two minutes with mike gallagher.
to be quite frank. we look at where we can create content on our platforms that engages audiences that help grow our platforms and cricket does have a particular passion in the uk, and i think it can drive audiences. and we look at everything that comes across our desk. so did you bid for the 2021 ashes? we don t talk about the specific bids in any context, because that sjust not something we do. but safe to say that all premium content that comes across our desk, we take a very good look at. ok, understood. minal, tell me, what do you make of the hundred, of the idea of a terrestrial broadcaster the bbc, in this case and sky both getting together, it s a bit of a hybrid model? yeah, i think it s a fantastic idea. | we kind of saw it tested | in cricket with the men s world cup a few years ago, when sky shared the final. rights with channel 4 - and they actually ended up getting an average audience of like 8.9 million people, l
hc one, like all other care home providers, was hit hard. and, like other companies, hc one wrote to councils asking for financial help. but two days after the letter was sent, the accounts report a £4.8 million dividend payment. and at the end of the day, they re begging for more money from cash strapped local authorities. people are cashing in on the value of their homes to fund that care. it s pretty shocking and disturbing. in the months that followed, hc one received £18.9 million of government pandemic support. it just doesn t sit well with me ethically or morally that amount of dividend while your dad eats a cheese butty for his tea. hc one says no shareholder dividend has been paid since 2017 .