behavior, and a snowball becomes an avalanche. we are just trying to stay ahead of it and make sure we send a message strong. yeah, that makes sense to me. again, it s always hard to tell, right? like, who is just engaged in sort of dress up and have nothing better to do, and who are people who are generally, you know, menacing or threatening. obviously, there s been real threats directed at people who work on elections all throughout the country and in arizona. this was an email obtained by local news outlet. you know, saying if you continue to f with the integrity of these elections, i guarantee you, we the people will remove you from office. additionally, if you have a home, we will own you for the remember the french revolution of 1799? other election workers have received this email. their name has been redacted, but it does seem like, it must be hard, in your position, to distinguish between what s scary and threatening and what is people being ridiculous, i guess. yeah, an
home, we will own you for the remember the french revolution of 1799? other election workers have received this email. their name has been redacted, but it does seem like, it must be hard, in your position, to distinguish between what s scary and threatening and what is people being ridiculous, i guess. yeah, and we are on the air on the side of making sure that people are safe. but i would say as an american, as a human in this nation, i feel for the people who come to work every day just trying to facilitate democracy, to vote in this republic. they come from all walks of life. they represent all parties and they go there with checks and balances to insure they can count the vote, and then deliver the results, and let the nation have confidence in those outcomes. their integrity is being questioned, their families are being threatened, and why? for what? there are leaders who are provocative in the way that contributes, if not, you know,
justice department referred the john kerry criminal case to the southern district of new york. two tweets from the president and the john kerry criminal case becomes a priority for the justice department. what s more, the statute they wanted us to use wasn t acted in 1799 had never been successfully prosecuted, almost 220 years on the books, there was not a single conviction. and so we investigated carey and determinant that he was entirely innocent, but still the justice department pushed and pushed and pushed, and when i declined, attorney general barr would not take no for an answer. he then transferred the case to another district. which fortunately didn t indict as well. it s an outrageous story of interference of the independents and integrity of the u.s. attorney s office, in this case the u.s. attorney s
morning america. talk about an effort to get you to prosecute the former secretary of kerry. that was outrageous. president trump attacks john kerry in two tweets saying kerry engaged in possible illegal conversations with iranian officials regarding the iran nuclear deal. the very next day the trump justice department refers the john kerry criminal case to the southern district of new york. two tweets by the president and the john kerry criminal case becomes a priority for the department of justice. and the statute they wanted us to use was enacted in 1799 and had never been successfully prosecuted. in about 220 years, this criminal statute was on the books, there were no convictions. cnn s kara scannell is following the story and joining us now. these are important and very serious allegations. right.