Inquiry, as you can see they are looking at some of the e mails that have been sent, lets have a listen into some of the inquiry at the moment. ~ u, into some of the inquiry at the moment into some of the inquiry at the moment. ~ u,. ,. , into some of the inquiry at the moment. ~ ,. ,. ,. , moment. We can see an email from nick wallis. Moment. We can see an email from nick wallis. The moment. We can see an email from nick wallis, the journalist, moment. We can see an email from nick wallis, the journalist, dated nick wallis, thejournalist, dated 16 december 2014. Nick wallis, the journalist, dated 16 december 2014. Nick wallis, thejournalist, dated 16 december 2014. Yes. To mark davis, 16 december 2014. Yes. To mark davis. Who 16 december 2014. Yes. To mark davis, who was 16 december 2014. Yes. To mark davis, who was essentially in charge of post offices media and communications, is that right . Yes. And mr wallace communications, is that right . Yes. And mr wallace says, communication
people, including you, another e mail from the bbc now raising people, including you, another e mailfrom the bbc now raising a series of new questions. yes? and thenif series of new questions. yes? and then if we go to the foot of page two. we can see you replied. 16th of december, 2.16. rodric williams wrote. and then if we go to the top of page three. you say. without having read them closely, only that this is getting ridiculous. we re being asked to address an ever expanding range of serious issues on a piecemeal basis, with constantly shifting goals, in an attempt to get nick wallis s story, which is, quote, news. on the upside, they suggest we are starting to land our point. this line of inquiry is focused on the user friendliness of horizon, not on the accuracy of what it records or what we do with that information. i will revert on the substance shortly. and then, if we go, please, to page one. at the foot