starting with president reagan. rco it contemplates that forme presidents have classified records. it gives them secure office space. it givesves him secure off themf with security clearances. it gives them secret service protection to guard the records . there was no allegation or evidence whatsoever that these records got into the wrong hands, like with hillary clinton s home servever, illegal home server that was hackedfo by foreign governments. this was a politicalreigvernment authorized unprecedented, unnecessary, unlawful political witch hunt authorized by attorney general merrick whic get back these crossfire hurricane records. number two get bac on the inven of the raid, the leather boundth documents. that s what this is all about. t they wanted tohe get these documents back because they re so. now, mike , this is while tomorrow is going to be interesting. thank you so much. corporate woke isme. on. meet the constitution this monday. lawyers are challenging nasdaq sthis mon
A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that the Securities and Exchange Commission's internal judges violate a defendant’s constitutional rights by denying them their right to a jury trial.
as a dependent, and that s the mainstay of the 1950s, then that s what this law continues toos. too. we heard that argument in the mississippi case just a couple of days ago. representative, let me finish with you, this case goes back to the district court, what s your expectation of what judge pitman will do. do you expect there to be an injunction while arguments continue, what do you think the next step is here? we re expecting there will be an injunction. we re also expecting it will go straight to the 5th circuit court which will also overturn that. the bottom line is from my understanding of this, and i m not a lawyer, but that the narrow pathway to sue here is with the licensing agencies. it s not with the attorney general. it s not with the state courts or the clerks so there s not going to be an injunction that s going to be put into effect that s going to put a stay on this. this unconstitutional ban is going to continue. it s already been going on for
will the supreme court weigh in here too? i think that it is likely that we ll see this go back to the supreme court at some point, but first it will have to be decided by the 5th circuit and they issued an administrative stay in this case that is only a temporary measure. it will hear and issue a ruling on broader issue coming in the next couple of days. i think that there is papers that are due to the court on thursday so we ll hear something after that. but yes, this could totally be on a fast track back to the supreme court. the way that this interacts with the cameron case in kentucky, again i think it is quite broad. the justice department noted in its brief before the 5th circuit that this is a situation where there needs to be some kind of action because basically you have a state in open defiance of the supreme court and its edict. and if the court or any court doesn t decide to intervene in these circumstances, then we ll have a situation where states can basically do whate