sean: under any circumstances would you get in this primary? he s a man of decency and character. i m proud of him. sean: is he strong enough to be president? look what he did to mccarthy. look at the vote card. i wouldn t have voted for it. exactly. kevin got played by the president of the united states. i m for results. sean: i don t think the american people benefit. i like the plan that would have saved 4.8 trillion. sandra: so we re at a point i think you are far more articulate, far more versed, far more energetic. i m just i have this theory that people will come calling. people don t think he s the guy. my thought. i ve got what do you have? sean: i don t want to make this an argument. i want you to explain. my argument to you is conservative policies work. you know? i don t care if it s ronald reagan, i don t care if it s newt gingrich s contract on
answering under any circumstances. would you ge t in this? no, no, none. i look, i really am i think he s a man of decency and character. i m really proud of the president, proud of what he s accomplished enoughe di to be president. that s a strong and going about what he just did. mccarthy he ran circles. w i look at the vote cardou and just got voted for it.n go exactly. kevin got played by tht playe president. i states i m for results. i m for results. i don t thinr sults. seak thed people benefit. i like the plan that would have saved 4.8 trillion. al hved l now.o we r so we re at a point i think you are far more articulate, far more versed, verse far more energetic. i m just i have this theory that people are going to comi hd because i don t think inon your party they think he s the guy that s my myguy., i now i vt got a buddy have wel wl, i don t want to make this an argument. i want you to explain because argument to you is conservative policies worconserk. you know, i do
[cheers and applause] mary catherine hams with us is get your take on this. look i felt the republicans in a much stronger handle on their plate. that they pass the bill to increase the debt ceiling and save 4.8 trillion narasimhan 2.1. it s the most we ve received but we never had a debt at 31 shalini there. i wish they never given especially on the issue of irs savings. in a couple of other provisions out of like seen speak of as many reasons to feel disappointed but i think there are a couple reasons to feel elated also. there will begins to not use the excuse that you only have the house we have a tight majority that s the old washington establishment excuse speaker mccarthy s approval rating has gone up 15 points since he took that to get us to the brink and hear the results. we have 28 billing to more
them are the conservatives in their public and house that is of the party of speaker mccarthy they did make a fundamental mistake in my opinion and that is the speaker my view she kept all members in the loop with the negotiation before anything was agreed to in anger on the right of the 29 but i ve counted is very palpable conservatives to hate the lack of real budget cuts the original by the republicans did in fact cut 4.8 trillion over ten years this one was 2.1 trillion and yes it s the first time the hubbert lower bucket this year than the year prior as of now the federal government insane covid level spending is premature to stay. the covert relief funds to be called back and redistributed to other government the cuts of joe biden s army of irs agents
cuts. you will remember that a month ago, the party itself passed a bill in congress calling for $4.8 trillion worth of spending cuts over the ten year period. this deal only puts those spending cuts at about 1.5 trillion, and they are mostly related to freezing spending. ratherthan are mostly related to freezing spending. rather than really carving out some of the more significant cash that is spent every year by the us government. so, this will be a hard victory for mccarthy himself to boast about amongst his colleagues. but nonetheless, he was able to drive through a deal when the president himself was talking about no negotiation whatsoever. with regards to spending cuts. so ultimately, i think it will be seen as one of those compromises where both sides walk away having felt aggrieved at least a little bit, by the final outcome. whether or not to those against the deal on the republican side choose to challenge mr mccarthy s leadership is another question.