and for those keeping score at home, it s two democratic appointees and one republican appointee who are hearing this case, which i think lends some optimism to the jack smith s team because of that makeup. it s also true, this argument for donald trump is a pretty extraordinary stretch. remember when we covered the mueller investigation. and there was much sdiscussion that there s is a justice department policy. not a law, but a policy, that says a sitting president should not be indicted. implicit in that policy, of course, he could be indicted later for something he did. that s always been the assumption. gerald ford pardoned richard nixon for his crimes in watergate. if he couldn t be prosecuted, there would be no need for a po pardon. for a former president, for conduct while in office. that s what the pardon was for. everyone assumed without the pardon, he could be prosecuted. once you are out of office, you are an order citizen like everyone else. interestingly
international airport. at 17:12.33, the recorded cabin pressure dropped from 14.09 to 11.64 pounds per square inch, when the aircraft was at 14,830 feet and 271 knots, the cabin altitude greater than 10,000 feet warning activated. at 17:12.34, the master caution activated. the cabin pressure dropped to 9.08 psi, at approximately 14,850 feet and 271 knots. at 17:12.52, the master caution
is they colleagues did with their government is they had colleagues did with their government is they had strikes on the table but the government still went back to the government still went back to the table the government still went back to the table to discuss and propose a variety the table to discuss and propose a variety of the table to discuss and propose a variety of solutions and eventually one of variety of solutions and eventually one of them was credible enough for those one of them was credible enough for those doctors to put back to their members those doctors to put back to their members. unlike that, our government is refusing members. unlike that, our government is refusing to members. unlike that, our government is refusing to do that, for no other reason is refusing to do that, for no other reason apart is refusing to do that, for no other reason apart from the fact of their own precondition. can reason apart from the fact of their own precondition
themselves encompass a number of years and they themselves suggested looking forwards into the future. of course, that would forwards into the future. of course, that would account and further pay erosion that would account and further pay erosion. ~ , ., that would account and further pay erosion. ~ y., , that would account and further pay erosion. ~ , ., , ., ., erosion. will you budge from that demand? to erosion. will you budge from that demand? to restore erosion. will you budge from that demand? to restore our- erosion. will you budge from that demand? to restore our pay? i erosion. will you budge from that demand? to restore our pay? to| erosion. will you budge from that i demand? to restore our pay? to be clear, demand? to restore our pay? to be clear. what demand? to restore our pay? to be clear. what you demand? to restore our pay? to be clear, what you want demand? to restore our pay? to be clear, what you want to demand? to restore our pay? to be clear, wha